sat 18/11/2017

Richard F Thomas: Why Dylan Matters review - tangled up in clues | reviews, news & interviews

Richard F Thomas: Why Dylan Matters review - tangled up in clues

Richard F Thomas: Why Dylan Matters review - tangled up in clues

Opening the door on Homer - why it's all Greek to Dylan

Harvard classicist makes the case for Bob Dylan

A year ago, Bob Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, his work commended by the committee "for having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition". The media response was like no other and we admirers felt vindicated. Still it was often necessary to explain why he deserved it and easy to fall back on the evidence of that mighty handful of great 1960s albums, plus Blood On the Tracks, Oh Mercy and Time Out of Mind.

Professor Christopher Ricks, long-time Dylan advocate whose vast output includes a fat tome on Dylan’s Visions of Sin, was among the cheerleaders. He has long compared Dylan to Milton, Tennyson and Eliot. When the news was announced, Richard F Thomas, Professor of Classics at Harvard, just across the Charles River from Ricks in Boston, was, coincidentally, heading off to teach his regular freshman seminar on Dylan. A teenager in New Zealand when Freewheelin’ was released, Thomas has now written a book – one that carries an endorsement from fellow-classicist Mary Beard, noting that he is the first classicist properly to turn his attention to Dylan.

For Thomas the singer-songwriter is “the supreme artist of the English language in my time” whose work “is literature, in an expansive rather than a limiting sense of the word”. But, “at the same time, Dylan’s award gives us reason to call into question the way we define ‘great literature' in modern society”. Robert Shelton, the New York Times critic whose 1961 review is credited with gaining Dylan his first record contract, long ago made the case for him as a poet, pointing out that Homer, too, was a busker.

Thomas rightly argues that the arts today are more vital than ever in what they can teach us and that “the art of Bob Dylan, no less than any other works produced by the human mind in its most creative manifestation, can be put to work serving and preserving the humanities”. His book makes a powerful case for doing so.

Why Dylan MattersInevitably he’s a Dylan anorak (he notes that “Blowin’ in the Wind” has been sung live by Dylan 1,400 times since the 1971 Concert for Bangladesh, “Masters of War” 884 times by the close of 2016) but he writes engagingly, eschewing straightforward biography and focusing on key albums and songs which he subjects to intertextual analysis. From the vast acreage of newsprint, he offers quotes from interviews, particularly those by Mikal Gilmore, where Dylan has, often elliptically, thrown huge light on his work, offering signposts which have gone unremarked – even by clued-up interviewers.

In 2001 he told Gilmore that he was “talking to a person that feels like he’s working around in the ruins of Pompeii all the time. It’s always been that way”. Years before, “When I Paint My Masterpiece” was replete with Roman allusion, and Rome is a city to which Dylan has often travelled. At Hibbing High he opted for a Latin class and in his early days in Greenwich Village he lodged for a time with Ray Gooch and Chloe Kiel, whose library (according to his memoir Chronicles, on which Thomas lavishes praise) provided the young Dylan with much food for thought: Thucydides, Sophocles, Tacitus, Ovid, Machiavelli, Dante, Suetonius… In 1991, with the first Gulf War raging, he told an interviewer: “You read the history of Ancient Greece and when the Romans came in, and nothing will ever bother you about America again. You’ll see what America is.”

Thomas does a great job of assembling such fragments, his commentary providing a context for his textual analysis. In “Lonesome Day” from “Love and Theft” he hears “Virgil, greatest of the Roman poets, singing with the voice of Dylan” who, like Virgil in Book 6 of the Aeneid, wants to “spare the defeated” and “tame the proud”. He hears Virgil also in “the majestic sadness” of “Not Dark Yet” (Time Out of Mind), “among the most poetic of Dylan’s songs”.

But Thomas doesn’t just write about Dylan and the Classics. He looks also at the influence of Rimbaud (as have many other critics) and suggests that the poem that inspired “Chimes of Freedom” was “Poor People in Church", which echoes both Rimbaud’s style and sentiment. He tackles “transfiguration”, which he describes as “an intertextuality of characters in the song, as much as the straight texts themselves", writing at length about “Tryin’ to Get to Heaven” (also from Time Out of Mind) which has “at least ten intertexts which Dylan arranges and reworks to produce a song whose elements speak from their own original contexts, while at the same time becoming integral and vital parts of the new song”. Using the famous “little blue notebook” (now in Tulsa, where Dylan’s archive will sit alongside Woody Guthrie’s), Thomas shows the meticulous work which went in to Dylan’s greatest songs, not least “Tangled Up in Blue”.

Dylan’s art, contends Thomas, “transcends time, and the power of his songs appeals to young adults whose parents were not yet born when Dylan started putting his words and music together. Dylan is here to stay. He has become a classic.”

Liz Thomson's website



Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters