sun 22/10/2017

Prom 22 review: Pygmalion, Pichon – theatrical take on Monteverdi's Vespers | reviews, news & interviews

Prom 22 review: Pygmalion, Pichon – theatrical take on Monteverdi's Vespers

Prom 22 review: Pygmalion, Pichon – theatrical take on Monteverdi's Vespers

Impressive young French conductor brings drama to Renaissance choral classic

Raphaël Pichon with the players of his Pygmalion EnsembleBBC/Chris Christodoulou

As the lights dim the choir turn their backs on the audience. A spotlight picks out a single singer. With one hand aloft he leads the male voices through the “Pater Noster” and “Ave Maria” in a stern and stately plainchant. Then suddenly the full battalion of cornetts and sackbuts, theorbos and recorders burst into the joyful opening of Monteverdi’s Vespers, and we are up and running.

The Vespers, like Bach’s B Minor Mass, was not heard complete in the composer’s lifetime, and may indeed not even have been conceived to have been heard in a single sitting. As Bach did later, Monteverdi seems to have published the Vespers in 1610 as a professional calling-card, demonstrating his varied skills as a composer in order to promote himself on the job market. One way or another it did the trick since, soon after, he landed the plum job of director of music at St Mark’s in Venice.Pygmalion at the PromsTaking the St Mark’s tradition as inspiration the young French conductor Raphaël Pichon made full use of the spaces within the Royal Albert Hall, with singers variously placed in the gallery, at the extremes of the stage, and by Sir Henry Wood’s statue in front of the organ. (Wood himself gave the first Proms outing for extracts from the Vespers in 1922, on a programme alongside Wagner and Suppé.) Pichon’s modern cori spezzati were well-judged and added variety to the performance, even if intonation was sometimes compromised in singers operating far from the instruments.

The music itself spans a wide range, from polyphonic choral writing, to madrigal-like vocal textures and passages of almost operatic solo writing. To this mix Pichon added a further element: the interstitial plainchant that would have been expected in liturgical performances in Monteverdi’s time. This, he says, “gives a very different face to this piece: something more quiet and contemplative.” They also added some 20 minutes to the running time of the piece, as all the plainchant passages were taken at a crawling pace. While this worked in places – such as at the beginning – it was surprising, given the inventiveness evident elsewhere, that there wasn’t any diversity in approach here.

As ever with music of this type, there are many performance practice decisions to be made. The Pygmalion Ensemble played period instruments, and produced a wonderful array of sounds, including a watery, glistening passage for theorbos and harps in the "Nigra sum" movement. The choir was 35-strong, which is midway between the Andrew Parrott ideal of very small forces, and the massed choir approach. It seemed to balance well with the instruments, and the choir had, for the most part, clear diction and excellent ensemble.Raphaël Pichon conducts the Ensemble Pygmalion performing Monteverdi’s Vespers at the BBC Proms.There was a pleasingly democratic approach to solos. The named soloists, when they weren’t singing as such, re-joined the choir, and at other times members of the choir took solos from within the ranks. It is hard to identify all the soloists for praise: the men managed both to look like one another and not much like their publicity shots. But a trio of them gave a stunning reading of the motet “Duo Seraphim”, and there was a wonderful interplay between stage and gallery in “Audi coelum”: “Hear, O heaven, words” with the reply coming back from the heavens.

Best of all were the two female soloists, dark-toned Giuseppina Bridelli and the lighter, brighter Eva Zaïcik, who did not blend, but matched each other beautifully in a number of rapturous duets. Pichon (pictured above) was understated and unshowy, keeping his gestures as small as possible, but always completely clear, always moving the music forward, impressively in control.

The final flourish was pure invention on Pichon’s part. After the end of the Magnificat, the usual end of the piece, he returned to the opening toccata, interspersed with more chant, offering a grander ending than Monteverdi provided. Where other decisions – such as the inclusion of chant – could seen as driven by the pursuit of authenticity, this seemed to be a gut feeling to end with a bang. And I can’t be sure Monteverdi wouldn’t have approved.

@bernardlhughes

Conductor Raphaël Pichon was understated and unshowy, keeping his gestures as small as possible, but always completely clear

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

Thought it was a thrilling performance- i'd not seen/heard it before live. Tenor Emiliano Gonzalez‐Toro standout for me. I enjoyed the attempts at theatre, plainsong chants, lovely details in the harpsichords, harps and theorbos + violins. Pichon bought out lots of textures, the dance feel of the orchestra at points juxtaposed with the almost chorale-tune like sopranos singing. Male altos/counter tenors really added a lovely tome. Went with my mum- in her 80's (who had conducted it in Cardiff 15-20 years ago) A superb evening that i'll long remember.I

I disagree with Bernard only concerning the plainchant - I thought it was a wonderful addition, performed with gripping articulation by both soloists and choir alike and never boring. A long evening, but such variety of colour, texture, rhythm, spatial disposition; reflective and poetic rather than overtly dramatic. The Vespers is the first great compendium of all that music can do - as if Monteverdi was flinging down his gauntlet to posterity and saying "there you are - now take it and run."

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters