sat 20/04/2024

theartsdesk in Colombo: Sri Lankan sports wannabes go global | reviews, news & interviews

theartsdesk in Colombo: Sri Lankan sports wannabes go global

theartsdesk in Colombo: Sri Lankan sports wannabes go global

The extraordinary movie about a ruse to win freedom

The Regal Cinema is a charming old place. At 300 rupees for a box seat (£1.50 on a good day for the SLR), you can put your feet up, sip your Fanta in style and, peeping through the plush velour curtains that separate you from both hoi polloi and screen (if not from the nouveaux in box 9), get a disconcertingly exact idea of how the place must have felt when the young Queen Elizabeth II sat in this very seat, shortly after the place was built for her.

There’s a new anthem now, of course, but you still have to stand up. Then you get the trailers for "Coming" movies (no rash promises as to when, precisely); a price-list for the seats you’re already sitting in; the management’s proud reminder that this theatre has been kitted out with Dolby Stereo (no less); the government certificate for the imminent feature (a picture of the actual handwritten document, so’s you can be sure it’s legit) – and then you’re off, to the echoing sounds of latecomers clacking the fold-down seats, businessmen answering their phones, and, if you’re very lucky and there’s a power cut, a chorus of whistles and clicks that would embarrass a Xhosa choir.

I was introduced to the Regal by my mate Rich, a local movie star who sometimes moonlights as a building contractor. He has a part in Machan – "German policeman with the square fat head," he told me – and he’d invited me to the Charity Gala Screening.

From the outset, and notwithstanding the evident lightheartedness of the film, everyone seemed to be having trouble following precisely what was going on. After about 40 minutes a voice came over the PA: "We are sorry to inform viewers that we have been given a copy of the film without subtitles." I hung in till the intermission, then went home, declining, as I departed, the manager’s invitation to claim a refund from the Orphaned Children of Sri Lanka Multiple Sclerosis and Basic Eye-Surgery Trust. Rich sheepishly fixed me up with a review copy, and I watched Machan at home, words and all. It is released in the UK this week.

Stanley, a disenchanted barman at the Galle Face Hotel, lives beyond the railway line with at least two generations of his family (it’s hard to be sure) in a house made of junk timber and plastic sacks. His machan – "mate" – Manoj sells fruit at traffic lights (or doesn’t, more accurately), desperately trying to support two mad aunts, two babies and a pre-teen brother who, when not employed stripping wriggly-tin from debtors’ roofs, is down the bookies, betting on the greyhounds.

on_the_beachKeen to leave Sri Lanka and seek work in Europe, our machans – and so many others like them – are between a poverty-stricken rock and the loan-sharks. They go to the German embassy, visa applications in hand. They pay in loose change and crumpled small notes. Manoj throws in an orange. Their applications are rejected – and not for the first time.

After work, drowning their sorrows on the beach (picture right), they find a poster for an international handball tournament in Bavaria, hosted by the Asian-German Sports Exchange Programme. Before they know it ("it" being the rules of handball) they are buying sports shirts, forging documents and reapplying for travel documents under the aegis of the Sri Lankan National Handball Team. But crime is crime and inevitably the forger, Ruan – a people-trafficking crook of the lowest order – decides he’d like in on the deal. So now they are three. Ruan spots an opportunity to kill several paperwork glitches with one rubber stamp and ropes in all the already illegal Indians, Pakistanis and East Africans he’s been fleecing. Now they are 10. It’s like a no-talent version of The Seven Samurai. Then a police sergeant catches them conspiring and they are obliged to confess… Eleven.

Sri_Lanka_teamMontages. Arguments. Setbacks (for McKee says it must be so). The possibility of selling a kidney to conjure the plane-fare. In extremis, one of them resorts to sleeping with German women for cash. But, sure enough, eventually, they go. Twenty-three of 'em. What’s more, when they get to Germany, rather than leg it straight out of the airport, they actually compete in the tournament (OK, "compete" is a bit strong; but they take part). And after three games in which, rather predictably, they suffer cricket-score defeats, the Germans get wise, the square-fat-headed policemen kick in the doors and arrest… a pile of dirty SLNHT laundry.

The 23 were never found. And the Sri Lankan National Handball Team continues not to exist.

Machan is directed by first-timer Uberto Pasolini (picture below), better known – in case you’d noticed a little narrative resonance – as the producer of The Full Monty. Like its thematic predecessor, though, this is no witless caper. Often funny, occasionally deeply touching, mature in its dialogue (including a high level of swearing, by local standards) and just about striking a balance between international appeal and parochialism (where’s the line between cliché and clarification?), it is no surprise Machan has picked up awards. Moreover – curiouser and curiouser and always popular with movie-goers – it has the additional merit of being true.

A_uberto_passoliniWhen Pasolini heard this story (which dates back to 2004) he set about, in collaboration with award-winning Sri Lankan playwright Ruwanthie de Chickera, producing a screenplay that not only told the rollicking real-life tale but used it as a vehicle to question our assumptions about illegal immigration.

Why, the film-makers ask, can some of us travel the world freely so long as we have $100 for visa fees, when others cannot? Because, some retort, when "I" come "here" I contribute; when "they" come to Europe they earn on the black market, pay no tax, and sponge off the system: the benefits are all one way.

Not so, says Pasolini. The heroes of Machan are not, it is made clear, all simply seeking the good life. Some are just seeking a job – any job (one of the more poignant moments of the film involves the replacement of an old bathroom attendant by an automatic hand-dryer). Some want to emigrate so their wives don’t have to. Others are bullied into it by their families. Only one decides that the price of leaving, emotionally and morally, is too high. What’s weird is that most of their families are happy – proud, even – to see their men-folk head off. "She doesn’t know this is the last time we’ll ever see each other," one confides. The film is full of such torments.

Of course, Machan is the kind of little-man story that playwrights and audiences love: and it’s hard to begrudge the spirit of those 23 guys. By inclination I am all for pissing in the face of joyless bureaucrats (they just had to be German, too, didn’t they?), and from Tooting to Toronto – or wherever the SLNHT are now – machans, we salute you for your sheer bloody cheek.

But border-skipping is still illegal, and unfortunately the emphasis of the film, if only by default, comes out against the cruel and unusual immigration laws of the West rather than against the abysmal and opaque governance of the country being left behind. It also implies that freedom to travel to – and even reside in – a foreign country is some sort of human right, which it’s not, and never has been. In that sense the film is basically wrong – and, as a sometime tax-payer at both ends of this particular equation, I can’t help feeling a little irked. The film-makers’ focus, I would suggest, might have been a little closer to home.

That said – and lest I sound like some rupee-pinching curmudgeon – when I discovered the film was given financial support by Europa Cinemas, had been co-produced by German and Italian companies, and that the copy I was watching was pirated from (wait for it) a German distributor, I laughed plenty. No kidding, it turns out you can’t get a kosher copy here for love nor money, and if you could it’d set you back 700 rupees: almost four times the going rate for a "local" DVD (I’m told).

But enough flippancy. Beneath the comedy, there is, of course, an ocean of real sadness to Machan. The stats that show a vast proportion of SL’s national income coming from remittances, disproportionately from women, detached from their families and working (legally) as cleaners in Emirati airports. One scene showed Manoj’s younger brother handing over his savings – visibly, substantially, less than what Colombo’s white extras are paid for a morning’s filming. The fact that, after Pasolini moved the entire movie to Germany for a fortnight of handball and exterior shots, one of the actors disappeared.

Comments

I saw Machan, or Sri Lanka National Handball Team as it was named in Paris, this summer. I greatly enjoyed it while watching it, but it is not without its problems. You say that the film is too eurocentric (basically), in that the film is more about 'coming here' to Europe than why Stanley et al want to leave Sri Lanka. And then you mention by whom the film was funded. I don't think it takes too much to join the dots and to see that European film initiatives produce films designed for European markets. And these films cannot be too foreign - both in terms of the places and cultures that they depict - and in terms of the kind of film (a genre buddy film, indeed along the lines of The Full Monty) that they aim to produce. In short: if money more than social concern is driving the film, then the film will always in some sense be 'compromised.' I'd take issue with your rant about border hopping. To skip borders is illegal for some people (it is not illegal for members of the EU to skip borders between EU countries, for example). The subtext of such a statement, which is only partially true, suggests an air of "don't you come here you scroungers." Now, perhaps immigration laws are iniquitous, and perhaps Machan does not show enough about Sri Lanka's domestic shortcomings - the reasons why Stanley and Manoj want to leave, not just in terms of glamourous opportunism in Europe, but the economic and physical demands that have been placed on them and their families and which make getting out of Sri Lanka an economic necessity - but you also say that travelling to a foreign country is not a human right. I would say that such a statement presupposes the existence of countries as if they were a historical given. As Eddie Izzard might say: "Do you have a flag?" By which I mean to say, in the spirit of Benedict Anderson: the whole system of nations is historically located and not a 'natural' given. If indeed Sri Lanka, like many 'postcolonial' countries, exists precisely because its identity/borders have in part been imposed from without (and still, as you know, problematically so), then why not feel that the system of borders and boundaries that colonialism in part set up is illegitimate, and why not seek ways around it? Your argument seems also to presuppose not only that Europe is the centre of power (which it may be from the 'realist's' perspective), but also that it OUGHT to be so. About which I am not so sure. In an era of increased globalisation, in which borders become easily crossed for those who can afford it, what you are really talking about - and which you do mention, but do not pursue in any great depth - is an issue of economic prosperity, or, more simply, class. Given that globalisation has, seemingly, not improved but rather worsened income gaps, then again why not feel resentment against the haves, who seem keen to keep the have-nots in their present condition? And since globalisation has in fact destroyed national boundaries as far as the flow of money is concerned (continued exploitation in the form of imperialism), then perhaps the film is right not to sit around and blame the haves in Sri Lanka alone, but to relate this to a wider, more global system of economy...? As a colleague has written in a forthcoming book (ahem, co-authored by me: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Moving-People-Images-Trafficking-Andrews/dp/1906...), Sri Lanka's principal export is labour. The Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment, for example, gets people 'legal' jobs abroad, a system that, as outlined in Nilita Vachani's film, When Mother Comes Home for Christmas (Greece/India/Germany, 1996), encourages debt bondage (i.e. contemporary slavery, as Kevin Bales would define it). Ruan might be despicable for being a people-trafficker, but what consideration is there again of the motivations of the trafficked in this film - and, indeed, of the self-trafficking and industrious handball team? Ruan is not the problem, though; he is a symptom of something that spreads far wider (and surely his inclusion in the team is a tacit admission that he really is not that bad a guy, just someone doing his job, because you've all got to make your money somehow, typically by selling your body in one way or another). What for me was most heartbreaking about this film is indeed the general admission and even prior awareness that these Sri Lankans are going to get poor and poorly paid jobs when they break the border - their admission that they will be exploited and that this is all that they can expect in Europe, and yet they still do it. Without wishing to be too 'white man's burden', there is a sense here that all is not well in the state of Sri Lanka for this to be so. Furthermore, that the players disappear at the end of the film suggests that they become part of the invisible workforce that actually underpins much of the European economy (exploited labour forces in agriculture; nannies; the sex industry - but now in Europe rather than with rich German tourists in Colombo). In other words, the film cannot show us that which is (willfully?) invisible to the European audience? Instead, their law-avoiding is deemed something of a triumph... Again, heartbreaking. Of course, you seem more than aware of such issues in your review, which I greatly enjoyed - but you seem torn between having sympathy for those who find themselves forced into a potential system of bonded labour or debt bondage - be it at home or abroad - and yet you seem to want to say that such a problem stays in Sri Lanka. Well, I just think it's too late; we don't live in that world anymore. And it's not just a question of Sri Lanka getting its act together to sort this situation out; in a globalised world, we all must.

PS - your comment addition has taken out my neatly spaced paragraphs and made my comment an ugly block of text which no one will read (though this is perhaps for the best). Maybe get your online dude to sort this out?

Add comment

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters