tue 23/04/2024

Horizon: What is Reality?, BBC Two | reviews, news & interviews

Horizon: What is Reality?, BBC Two

Horizon: What is Reality?, BBC Two

Physicists give us a taste of reality in a world where nothing is as it appears

Horizon took a funny turn this week. The new series started off gently enough – there was a nostalgic look back at 60 years of science on the box, then an exploration as to what makes us clever (the fun this entailed when vaguely well-known people sweated through a series of IQ tests). But last night it wanted us to get to grips with something very slippery indeed, so slippery that even the eminent scientists responsible for unleashing some of the more frontier theories in particle physics readily admitted their conceptual limitations in understanding their own formulations.

So when the off-screen interviewer tentatively suggested that she thought she was beginning to understand something called the Holographic Principle (how the universe was a hologram?) she was quickly slapped down: “If you think you understand, then you don’t,” said the eminent scientist Leonard Susskind (the brains behind String Theory and the possibly even stickier Holographic Principle), before adding, disarmingly, “because nobody does.”

So. Reality. Is it, as Dr Johnson believed, simply what we see with our eyes, feel with our hands and trip over with our feet? Or does it, as Bishop Berkeley expounded, come into being only when it’s perceived? (Does the moon disappear when we’re not looking at it, as Einstein himself once puzzled?) And how does one corroborate such perceptions with other perceivers? And might not this, in fact, be all a dream? Or, perhaps, a Matrix-like nightmare?

We saw kids kicking a ball about in a park, each kick a possible act of Johnsonian refutation of the immateriality of the universe. And we were falsely lulled by the soothing, avuncular tone of actor Bernard Hill, narrating as if he were reading us a quirky little tale before bedtime. And then we were even treated to a bit of gentle geek humour: “Reality is a set of things we know to be the case,” began one scientist. “Reality is full of facts. Facts such as, ‘It’s difficult to get a date on a Saturday night’.” See, we were being told, these scientists really aren't scary at all – they are just like you and me.

But then we were transported to Reality HQ, and this is where it all started to get fuzzy. Reality HQ is Fermilab in Chicago, which specialises in high-energy particle physics. Here you’ll find the Tevatron, the giant underground particle accelerator where particles get bashed about at great velocity. The hunt is still on for Higgs boson, which will add one more piece to the protean jigsaw of our understanding of reality (but who can tell you whether we should be holding our breath or not?).

Then it was off to Vienna to learn something about the Double-Slit Experiment (with Professor Anton Zeilinger, main picture) which sees photons behaving strangely, and thence back to the US for a very brief history of parallel universes (via Professor Susskind's elusive holograms). Here one can imagine infinite universes and infinite versions of oneself. Actually, this was the point at which I relaxed again. I really liked cosmologist Max Tegmark, who seems to have a very poetic, Platonic take on the world.

But otherwise it was all a bit heavy. As heavy as being sucked into a metaphorical black hole. It was all so much simpler (relatively) when reality  was the preserve of philosophers rather than mathematicians and theoretical physicists. It was even simpler when it was the preserve of God. But, still, it was good of Horizon to have given it a shot.

Next week, a particle physicist attempts to explain relational aesthetics in contemporary fine-art practice. He’ll probably make a pretty good fist of it, too.

Share this article

Comments

Absolutely brilliant. Push our interest boundaries further, if we are armchair detectives, we are armchair cosmologists- but please! where can i learn the math equations written on lighthouse window-

Congratulation Horizon on a brilliant programme - Pushed the envelope of my rather cramped brain. The holographic concept of reality took my fancy. Being a somewhat "old-fashioned" believer in God, I would rather like to express it as a projection from the mind of God!

My brain hurts now! Despite all the controversies of the BBC, Auntie still produces some of the best television in the world. Enlightening, funny, thought provoking and mind blowing at the same time..... Great series Horizon, making science accessible for most of my lifetime. Yes it has it's critics that it drums down science, I would disagree programs like this are inspiring to the young and informative to my age ;-) is the balance right? Yes, more please!

most of the program was stuff they've covered before. The holonomic Universe could do with a program all to itself, at least. Also they made it seem like a new idea but it's been round since the 70's. generally credited to David Bohm and Karl Pribram. Further reading for anyone interested: Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge. and Michael Talbot, "The Holographic Universe" 1991, HarperCollins

Thought the programme was great, they said they were doing an experiment soon to find out if we were living as a hologram, when is it being done and where can i find out more about it ?

Yet again a missed opportunity to convey the amazing work of the World's top scientists. The whole programme was overlarded with totally irrelevant effects & junk sound clips, both distracting & intensly annoying. Whatever happened to the straightforward presentations of the past? I shall resist the temptation to watch more of this self indulgent, patronising tripe!! Bob Lee.

Great pogram, massively insightful. Being a geek i had to figure out how much faster any computer/phone/processor would be if it was quantum, and the result was: 921108170135826810275068192 297853020756110280646550086 64820 times faster just by being quantum, adding a 3rd state to binary....i was amazed as the length of the number as i figured it out, especially as i had to divide by 128 to arrive here!

on seeing this program made me think of something strange that happened to me,in summer of 93 or 94 i was sunbathing reading a book,when for split second everything went black by black i mean everything vanished,like nothing just black i thought damn i just blacked out and carried on reading,until my younger sister came out of the shed and said warren did everything just go black to you,my jaw hit the floor,ive been trying to understand what i experienced ever since,after seeing this program i emailed some physicists including professor susskind,none have replied,proberly think im crazy or lying.

I really love science docos, but I tend to avoid Horizon because of the eye-abusing effects they use. Is it to keep the attention of the ADHD generation? Does the complete opposite for me unfortunately. Can't stand it. Carl Sagan didn't need it, so why does Horizon? As long as these ridiculous ediI really love science docos, but I tend to avoid Horizon because of the eye-abusing effects they use. Is it to keep the attention of the ADHD generation? Does the complete opposite for me unfortunately. Can't stand it.

The 'reality' of this program was an hour of Yosser Hughes talking b*llocks

Add comment

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters