sun 24/11/2024
Home > new music > CD: Status Quo - Quid Pro Quo

CD: Status Quo - Quid Pro Quo | reviews, news & interviews

CD: Status Quo - Quid Pro Quo

CD: Status Quo - Quid Pro Quo

The archaeological evidence suggests that organic life was here once

by Wednesday, 25 May 2011
Share
'Quid Pro Quo': Status Quo are now recording in Latin. Not much else has changed

After 29 studio albums, eight compilations, four live albums, amounting to a total of 41 at pretty much one for every year of their existence, the denimosaurus we know as Status Quo has issued a release the title of which is entirely, and for the first time ever, in Latin. Unless you count Quo (1974). Quid Pro Quo, one very much suspects, does not translate in Rossi-Parfitt speak as “this for that”. Indeed “quid” looks to be a reference to lucre, which the Quo have been raking in for what feels like centuries on an unvarying diet of three- and, when they can get away with it, two-chord stonewashed boogie. (And sometimes even one.) If it ain’t broke etc: Quo erat demonstrandum.

After 29 studio albums, eight compilations, four live albums, amounting to a total of 41 at pretty much one for every year of their existence, the denimosaurus we know as Status Quo has issued a release the title of which is entirely, and for the first time ever, in Latin. Unless you count Quo (1974). Quid Pro Quo, one very much suspects, does not translate in Rossi-Parfitt speak as “this for that”. Indeed “quid” looks to be a reference to lucre, which the Quo have been raking in for what feels like centuries on an unvarying diet of three- and, when they can get away with it, two-chord stonewashed boogie. (And sometimes even one.) If it ain’t broke etc: Quo erat demonstrandum.

Explore topics

Share this article

Share

Comments

Submitted by Pete Quinn (not verified) on Thu, 26/05/2011 - 18:14
The Quo enter their Latin phase. I like it. Possible title for next album: Quo Vadis?

Submitted by Wayne (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 14:17
Typically blinkered and music-snob-esque review.

Submitted by Wayne again (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 14:48
Unbelievable how a "reviewer" can get away with this rubbish. It looks very much like most if not all of this review was written before the album was taken out of it's packaging. I dare anyone to listen to this album and not see how fresh Quo sound on it. There are some tracks on here that any modern band would be delighted to have written, and very little that could be tarred (unfairly) with the 3 chord brush. This reviewer should listen to the album again (or for the first time) and have the open mind that one would expect a decent reviewer to have.

Submitted by Kristma (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 14:51
What a load of rubbish and what an idiotic review. I can't hear any shades of Caroline in the mentioned tracks. P.S. The name of that airport in Greenland is Kulusuk, not Kussuluk. Get your facts right before you take a pen. (referring to another article by the same author)

Submitted by Mike (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 15:48
what an excellently scathing review. It's impressive how the die-hard/dullard quo fans are already surfacing. Status Quo are irrefutably a national joke. They're musically limited to the point of absurdity and about as exciting as the dust their records are gathering nationwide.

Submitted by Wayne (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 17:33
Look, I'm not going to get into an argument about taste. If you don't like quo, that's fine. I'm not biggoted enough (unlike you it seems) to be able to think for everyone else, and insist that they like quo just because I do. My point is merely about the review. It is an unfair reflection on the album. It portrays an opinion that could have been (and possibly was) written before the album was listened to by the reviewer. The opening track (which I'd imagine any decent reviewer would get as far as) is one of the freshest sounding tracks you could imagine. It's very modern, and dare i say it, doesn't even really sound like quo in the way you'd expect. This album is full of diversity, but of course you'd have to listen to know that. Again: nit trying to sway anyone's taste, merely saying the reviewer seems to have not listened to the album. I agree that in some ways quo has become a joke, I'm not as narrow minded as th reviewer not to realise that. But it's an unfair opinion (I can't bring myself to call it review any more) that has been written. If my reply seems very well written for a "dullard" excuse me for breaking your stereotype.

Submitted by Johns (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 18:44
Seems to me Wayne and Mike are a pair of idiots who know nothing about Quo apart from the usual stereotypical crap that cheap shot journalists come out with. Anyway it doesn't matter in the end, because Quo and Quo fans have been dealing with the same kind of ignorance since the early 70's!!

Submitted by Wayne (not verified) on Sat, 28/05/2011 - 18:53
Johns, I think we're on the same side. How have I given an impression that I know nothing about Quo? My point is exactly that the reviewer knows little or nothing about them (his opinion sounds like the usual Quo-bashing that we're used to reading). Read my first post, I'm all in favour of quo, unlike Mike. More to the point, I'm in favour of an honest review.

Submitted by Johns (not verified) on Tue, 31/05/2011 - 12:09
Sorry Wayne must have typed your name on automatic pilot

Submitted by Wayne (not verified) on Tue, 31/05/2011 - 13:02
Sound JohnS, thanks for the apology...accepted. Rock on!

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

more New music

Music Reissues Weekly: Stefan Gnyś - Horizoning Folk-inclined Canadian’s brooding album emerges 55 years after it was recorded
Album: Kim Deal - Nobody Loves You More Gems in the rough on the Pixie / Breeder's long-awaited solo debut
Hannah Scott, Worthing Pavilion Theatre Atrium review - filling an arctic venue with human warmth Singer-songwriter brings moving, autobiographical songs to the freezing south coast
Album: Joan Armatrading - How Did This Happen and What Does It Now Mean Held in love and affection
Album: FaithNYC - Love is a Wish Away Wonderfully produced off-piste music
English Teacher, Queen Margaret Union, Glasgow review - Mercury winners step up in size with style The Leeds quartet's set was varied in genre but thrilling when punchy
Album: Father John Misty - Mahashmashana The flawless union of style and substance
Kenny Barron Trio, Ronnie Scott's review - a master of the cool Eloquent story-telling from jazz giant
Album: Body Count - Merciless Ice goes on autopilot
Music Reissues Weekly: Magazine - Real Life, Secondhand Daylight, The Correct Use of Soap The first three albums from Howard Devoto’s post-punk marvels hit the shops again
Bob Dylan, Royal Albert Hall review - cracked ritual from rock elder A glorious mixture of mask and authenticity
ARK: United States V by Laurie Anderson, Aviva Studios, Manchester review - a vessel for the thoughts and imaginings of a lifetime Despite anticipating disaster, this mesmerising voyage is full of hope

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters