mon 30/12/2024

The Snowman and the Snowdog, Channel 4 | reviews, news & interviews

The Snowman and the Snowdog, Channel 4

The Snowman and the Snowdog, Channel 4

Sequel to hardy Christmas perennial can't escape the shadow cast by the original

'The Snowman and the Snowdog': for life, or just this Christmas?

Over the past 29 years, annual screenings of the TV adaptation of Raymond Briggs's 1978 picture book The Snowman have become an integral part of Christmas. Now, on the 30th anniversary of its first broadcast, the original has friendly competition from The Snowman and the Snowdog, a new animation featuring the be-hatted, smiling fellow.

Not written by Briggs but approved by him, The Snowman and the Snowdog was charming, and a treat to look at. It was sensitive, too; a real heart-string tugger. The snowdog was unreservedly cute. But as to whether this new seasonal offering was necessary? Probably not.

The Snowman and the SnowdogAs bah-humbug-ish as it sounds, it was impossible to watch The Snowman and the Snowdog without being all too aware of the shadow cast by The Snowman. Using much the same team, like the 1982 film it was created from individually drawn and hand-coloured (in crayon) images. With no computer-enabled imagery, this was animation as it used to be, faithfully evoking the flickering, washed-out look of the original. The early night-time scenes had the feel of charcoal drawings.

Time, its passing and loss are central to Briggs's book and the films. John Coates, who was behind both adaptations, died before The Snowman and the Snowdog was completed. Within the new production, time was difficult to pin down. The house had an old-fashioned telly with knobs for controls. No computers or digital-era objects were in evidence. Yet, when the snowman, snowdog and boy took flight, the cityscape was bang up to date – a London replete with The Shard, Gherkin and London Eye. A swoop over the Olympic Park would have completed the set. The household was one where time had stopped and the outside world is a place to be seen at a distance, from above, as through a lens.

The Snowman and the SnowdogReferences to and borrowings from The Snowman and the Snowdog’s roots were much clearer: a portrait of Briggs’s Fungus the Bogeyman hung on the bedroom wall; a girl in a first-floor window saw the snowman passing, just as in the original. On arriving at the North Pole snowman gathering, a single penguin had fled the southern hemisphere to join in the fun. In the original, there were masses of the dinner-jacketed waddlers. The initial ascent in both animations were like peas in a pod. More generally, even with the addition of the sweet snowdog the narrative in both was pretty much the same.

Despite the decision to keep the modern world at arm's length, setting it in a lone-parent household acknowledged that notions of the family ideal could be re-set. As was beginning with the loss a family member, a beloved pet.

Rather than being a sequel to The Snowman, this was a reconfiguring, with additions and replacements – no motorbike this time; London instead of Brighton. Although seamless, it was like watching a half-remembered version of the original, albeit with less impactful music. Whatever anyone’s feelings about Aled Jones's “Walking in the Air”, the new, quasi-Coldplay sounds of “Light the Night” failed to repeat its impact.

Whether The Snowman and the Snowdog is for life or just this Christmas remains to be seen. It’s a fair bet the TV programmers have made the decision already.

Kieron Tyler’s blog

Watch the trailer for The Snowman and the Snowdog

Comments

Why do people, even 30 years later, still think that it was Aled Jones who sang the theme song? The Choirboy Peter Auty is the vocal heard on the original animation, Aled Jones re-recorded it. The omission of the timeless "Walking in the Air" in the Snowman and the Snowdog was correct but to be replaced by the insipid blandness of "Light the Night" which was then reprised later on felt like design by committee and will date this animation very quickly.

A completely pointless remake. Same plot as the original, same (beautiful) graphics, cringingly banal music instead of the memorable "Walking in the Air". Makes me angry that such effort be expended to so little purpose. Hope it never re-emerges. A new generation of children deserve the original.

I was dismayed and annoyed by the sop to 'modern life' political correctness regards there being no father-figure anywhere in the film. No doubt if there's ever another follow-on film, the mother will be in a same-sex marriage. :-(

On the hope that this does not re-emerge. I did fear the decision that it will come around again will have already been made by programmers - but I noticed it is being used to promote a high-street building society, so that means it probably won't be allowed to be forgotten. 

Yes the themes were much the same, yes the plot was alarmingly similar and yes there was some reference to an updated household structure but like the time of year it was delivered, the same values and expectation come around. Christmas is about family whatever your family set up, Christmas is about the excitement a child experiences and in the uk the thrill of a snowfall. I fail to understand the abhorrent repulsion people feel. It's not the original but I doubt it will ever replace that, so treasured as it is. It's a Christmas staple. But then I doubt that was ever the point. This was a homage to a hugely successful story and animation created to complement the original. I hope it's released next year again. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters