thu 26/12/2024

Hardenberger, Pöntinen, Wigmore Hall review - superstar trumpeter shows his class | reviews, news & interviews

Hardenberger, Pöntinen, Wigmore Hall review - superstar trumpeter shows his class

Hardenberger, Pöntinen, Wigmore Hall review - superstar trumpeter shows his class

A challenging programme was enjoyable - but less would have been more

Swedish trumpet virtuoso Håkan Hardenberger© Marco Borggreve

There can be no questioning trumpeter Håkan Hardenberger’s extraordinary mastery: his big, unforced sound, mellifluous legato, athletic virtuosity and utterly controlled high notes.

But his well-attested commitment to the avant-garde led the Wigmore audience to stay away in droves from his recital last night, leaving the hall insultingly empty for such a star performer.

But the programme didn’t just look intimidating on paper, it turned out to be somewhat hard work in practice, not only for those Wigmore patrons who prefer Beethoven and Schubert, but even for those of us with an enthusiasm for newer music.

After George Antheil’s mercurial 1951 Trumpet Sonata, the main work of the first half was Staffan Storm’s Three Autumns. This is a monumental 35-minute piece that explores a massive range of techniques and textures, showing a good feel for large-scale architecture, but which is ultimately too long for itself.

Swedish pianist Roland PöntinenStorm, a Swedish contemporary of Hardenberger, wrote the piece for the trumpeter and his recital partner, pianist Roland Pöntinen (pictured right), in 2016, and the two players clearly enjoy its strenuous demands. Beginning with an insistent high E, reiterated through double- and triple-tonguing, the music moved through sections of stormy passion, beguiling improvisation, effulgent melody and hard-earned serenity. Hardenberger dealt with the many challenges with a cool efficiency, where Pöntinen was scampering around the keyboard in a part that was similarly taxing.

The piece was enjoyable, the performances scintillating, and yet the slightly baggy form left me with the feeling I’d have enjoyed it a lot more if it had been about 10% shorter.

I had a similar feeling about the centrepiece of the second half, Berio’s Sequenza X for trumpet and piano resonance. It might seem impertinent to have doubts about this avant-garde classic, but for all its sonic delights the musical material seems overstretched for its 18-minutes duration. Berio’s central idea – which is a brilliant one – is for the trumpet’s notes to be captured by the resonances of the piano (on which Pöntinen was silently depressing notes). Hardenberger sometimes played to the audience, sometimes directly into the lid of the piano, interspersing these isolated notes with streams of faster notes. But for all his whimsical characterisation and magisterial tone, Hardenberger couldn’t persuade me of the musical narrative behind the notes.

Some of the more interesting pieces came, ironically, with Hardenberger offstage. After the Berio he took a much-deserved breather and Pöntinen played three short solos: the ineffable Wasserklavier, an allusive Sciarrino miniature and a high-spirited rendition of George Gerswhin’s Swanee, based on the composer’s piano-roll recording. This music provided a welcome variety of harmonic soundworld, and a break from the hardcore modernism dominating the rest of the programme.

After this, Pöntinen’s own L’éléphant rose was a disappointment, the music far less interesting than the title promised. The Seagull, by Swedish jazz pianist and composer Jan Lundgren, had a 1950s smokiness and melancholy, Hardenberger floating his high notes effortlessly and faultlessly. They finished with a sincere reading of Ravel’s Pavane pour une infante défunte, Hardenberger’s muted playing humble and eloquent, and Pöntinen enjoying the rare opportunity to project a singing line.

@bernardlhughes

For all his whimsical characterisation and magisterial tone, Hardenberger couldn’t persuade me of the musical narrative behind the notes

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters