The Slaves of Solitude, Hampstead Theatre review - crude, over-dramatic and under-motivated | reviews, news & interviews
The Slaves of Solitude, Hampstead Theatre review - crude, over-dramatic and under-motivated
The Slaves of Solitude, Hampstead Theatre review - crude, over-dramatic and under-motivated
New adaptation of Patrick Hamilton novel is thinly written and poorly staged
The Second World War is central to our national imagination, yet it has been oddly absent from our stages recently. Not any more.
The Slaves of Solitude is set in the winter of 1943. We are in the Rosamund Tea Rooms boarding house, in Henley-on-Thames. Miss Roach, an educated middle-class “worthy spinster dame” who works in publishing, has fled London during the Blitz and has taken up residence here. She is lonely, and has little in common with the other residents: odious Mr Thwaites, a pompous, prejudiced and pretentiously phrase-making old man, Mr Prest, a retired actor who misses the bright lights of St Martin’s Lane, two guests Miss Steele and Mrs Barratt, and Mrs Payne, the owner.
Lovers of Hamilton’s novels will recognise the psychological territory
In the dining-room, the guests gather for meal times, and exchange barbed comments and pieces of gossip. As well as clashing over politics. But the equilibrium of the place is disturbed when Miss Roach meets Lieutenant Drayton Pike, an African-American soldier stationed nearby, and Vicki Kugelmann, a German migrant who has been living in England for a number of years. An emotional connection develops between the three of them, which also – during one drunken night – draws in Mr Thwaites, resulting in sexual jealousy, frustrated attraction and two offers of marriage. But the darker, and more bitter, emotions of loneliness and hatred combine to scuttle any hopes of a happy ending.
Lovers of Hamilton’s novels will recognise the psychological territory, mapped out in empty bottles of alcohol and overflowing ashtrays. The slightly greasy glamour of the down-at-heel and the social outcast, observing conventional life with an intelligent eye and a heavy heart, craving a more fulfilled life, wishing they would be more present, are all in the story. The main trouble is that, a few brief hints apart, they are absent from this stage version. There’s little distinctiveness in the writing, and no real sense of Hamiltonian futility.
Instead there are a couple of scenes of melodramatic excess, and some nasty and cruel passages that fall flat because the play’s characterisation is too thin, and too unconvincing. Miss Roach, for example, is meant to be a sad loner, so when she says that she enjoys sex with the American, it simply beggars belief. Near the end, there are a couple of short passages about hatred, which make your ears prick up in hope, but none of them are developed. The plotting is clumsy, and the dialogues a bit too perfunctory.
Although the press night was slightly jinxed, with Tim Hatley’s trundling scenery getting a bit stuck, the cast (pictured above) of Jonathan Kent’s uninspiring production do their best with some rather dull material. Of course, Fenella Woolgar is too good an actor to fail to breathe life into Miss Roach, and she does give some sense of the woman’s dusty existence and her thwarted dreams. Likewise, Daon Broni lends Lieutenant Pike a rugged charm, and you can see why Americans were a magnet for English women. Lucy Cohu’s Vicki is perhaps a touch too much of a caricatured foreigner, and Clive Francis’s Thwaites has too little to work with.
If The Slaves of Solitude is under-motivated and over-dramatised, it still manages to evoke some of the details of wartime: the blackout, the rationing and spam fritters, the bad news from the front and the agricultural volunteering. Soviet allies, details of bombing and the British love of pets all get a name-check. The way that the experience of war affects all aspects of your psyche is strongly conveyed, and some of the frenzy of a hothouse society also comes across well. But the main feeling is impatience at the crudeness of the adaptation and a distinct feeling that this play is a dud.
rating
Explore topics
Share this article
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment