thu 28/11/2024

The Naked Choir with Gareth Malone, BBC Two | reviews, news & interviews

The Naked Choir with Gareth Malone, BBC Two

The Naked Choir with Gareth Malone, BBC Two

A rushed competition obscures the human interest of communal singing

Gareth Malone: enthusiastic charm replaced by unconvincing whip-cracking

It’s nearly 10 years since Gareth Malone’s series The Choir first brought amateur choral singing to an improbably appreciative television audience. Like baking, amateur choral singing is quintessentially British – most other cultures leave them to professionals – and their affectionate place in the national psyche has created successful viewing brands.

Yet this time Malone has introduced that serpentine cliché of contemporary programming, the reality competition, into the innocent enthusiasm that so inspired reluctant singers of his previous series, from shy teens to military wives. By so doing, we lost some of his warmth, and some of those programmes’ charm.

In this first of six shows, four amateur choirs from London and south-east England were given a hit song to adapt and prepare for a performance before that Trojan Horse of challenge-based cliché, the expert judging panel. From Pavarotti to Barry White, a fluid larynx has traditionally been equated with a waistline of similarly expansive dimensions, so it’s perhaps just as well the nakedness in the title refers to the musical style of a capella, in which unaccompanied voices create the full range of harmony and melody.

With his bustling affability and curious dickie-bow, he’s more like a bleached David Dickinson

The journey (another ready source of cliché) we took through the choirs’ nervy preparations was in many ways more interesting than the outcome. Communal music-making, as politicians running arts education seem incapable of grasping, teaches a gamut of valuable skills, from arithmetic to public speaking, and en route to the finals we encountered all manner of stories illuminating the enriching human experience that people singing together create.

With the Spinnaker Chorus, from Portsmouth, we learned of the mutual support their community offered a member with breast cancer, while with Stratford East Singers (pictured below), from east London, choir-leader Byron told of how music helped him avoid the mean streets of his childhood estate. That choir has a policy of no auditions, relying on eagerness and collective discipline to hone raw talent into honeyed sound. The techniques, both musical and psychological, with which a star of the bathtub can be turned into a convincing stage act, are fascinating, and Malone’s empathetic and approachable manner brings out these details naturally.

Stratford East SingersHe’s less convincing cracking the whip as a challenge-setting reality star. He lacks the menace to be a Sugar or Cowell, and doesn’t even have the beady-eyed perfectionism of Masterchef’s Michel Roux. With his bustling affability and curious dickie-bow, he’s more like a bleached David Dickinson, marvelling at the unexpected musical riches he’s uncovered in Romford and Horndean. But rather than embrace the human interest these choirs offer, the final section of the programme featured a rather hurried competition.

Even then, more time was spent bigging up the judges, and watching them peer over their garish statement glasses that perched on the nose with the subtlety of Katie Hopkins at a Red Cross meeting, than hear anything illuminating about the singing. In the end, it was quite zeitgeisty, and not in a good way. Ego and the insistence on competition triumphed over an engaging story about music, community, and the best sense of emotional nakedness.

@matthewwrighter

Ego and the insistence on competition triumphed over an engaging story about music and the best sense of emotional nakedness

rating

Editor Rating: 
3
Average: 3 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

You do rather wonder whether Matthew Wright has a grudge against Malone. apparently he has "introduced that serpentine cliché of contemporary programming, the reality competition" whatever that is supposed to mean. He's working with choirs - what on earth has changed? And, episode by episode, we're seeing both the human drama and the stretching and development of skills that bring each choir to a level they'd never dreamt of. Is it good TV? Yes. is it a gripping competition? Yes. Engaging? Yes. Wright's review? You may just have stood on a bit on the pavement.....

On the contrary, I admire the earlier programmes, and wrote of their "charm", and their "appreciative audience". Perhaps Neil Marshall missed the first two paragraphs. What's changed, clearly, is that this series is a competition, whereas the in earlier programmes Malone concentrates solely on getting the singers to work better together. The reason the competition format is a cliché is that we have dozens of competition tv formats these days, from X-Factor and Apprentice through to Bake-Off, to mention only the most famous. And while some of these formats are appropriate for the activity in question, the beauty of amateur choral singing, as Malone demonstrated so well in all of his previous series, is that it brings people together in a more interesting and valuable way than the rather trite competition on show here, which I don't think did add anything of interest to the musical sections of the show. "Serpentine" is a biblical reference, alluding to Satan as serpent bringing evil (the competition) into an innocent communal world (amateur choral singing). Do try to keep up, Mr Marshall. 

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters