wed 25/12/2024

Prom 72 review: Vienna Philharmonic, Harding - uncertain Mahler Six partly redeemed by brass | reviews, news & interviews

Prom 72 review: Vienna Philharmonic, Harding - uncertain Mahler Six partly redeemed by brass

Prom 72 review: Vienna Philharmonic, Harding - uncertain Mahler Six partly redeemed by brass

Nothing like a blow or two from a giant mallet to kick a fits-and-starts performance into life

Look at me: Daniel Harding and the players of the Vienna PhilharmonicBoth images by Chris Christodoulou

Outlines of a real face had begun to emerge in Daniel Harding’s conducting personality. His youthful rise to the top initially yielded neutral concerts with the LSO and a glassy, overpraised recording of Mahler’s Tenth in the Deryck Cooke completion with the Vienna Philharmonic.

But then I heard a supple, intensely lyrical Brahms Third in the Concertgebouw and what came across on CD as a fine live interpretation of Mahler Six from Munich. With last night's Prom we were back to the enigma, best summed up in Otto Klemperer’s channeling of Brecht and Weill’s Jimmy Mahoney and his refrain “aber etwas fehlt” – “but something’s missing”.

It’s hard luck on Harding that he had to follow two stunning concert-hall Mahler Sixths from real electrifiers – Andris Nelsons with the Boston Symphony Orchestra at the 2015 Proms, and Paavo Järvi showing us how febrile and alive Tokyo's NHK Symphony Orchestra could be at the Festival Hall this March. The players really burned for those two, and while if you watch the Vienna Phil’s filmed interpretations with Bernstein, you see him lathering up and the players looking impassive, there’s the same volcanic intensity in the actual playing. Not for Harding, on this evidence. While there are more women in the orchestra than in previous years – and you have to take the management's word that all auditions are given behind a screen – it was no pleasure to watch this crew virtually ignoring their conductor.

The opening march sounded promising, with basses swelling their opening strut and horns very vocal in their underlining. It soon became clear that this was going to be a responsibly paced rather than a feral first movement – but then, with the varied recap of the sweeping lyrical melody which brings some relief to the fevered soul, security vanished as the players briefly got out of synch.Harding and Vienna Philharmonic at the PromsPerhaps that was the fault of the Albert Hall acoustics, a momentary lapse. But in the Andante – given the lack of initial white heat, it felt more unconvincing than usual second rather than third in an order Mahler himself changed several times – confidence seemed to ebb for longer. The opening flow didn’t last, the first clarinet only just managed to get back on course after a late entry, and bumps beset what should be an organic rise to a heartfelt climax.

Scherzo and finale recovered their poise, but where were individuality or presence in an impossibly pallid woodwind section, all the more of a shock after so many excellent counterparts in earlier Proms? The horn section, and the solos of its leader, were the distinctive stars of the show, whether growling in grotesquerie or heartaching in the twilight zone. A lonely tuba waxed balefully eloquent in the slow introduction to the ultimate march mania and the trombone ensemble intoned beautifully. What, though, of the famous Vienna string sound? Nothing special at all from where I was sitting.

Until, that is, the two hammer-blows of fate – a giant wooden mallet, rather more effective than overloud bells of both cow and tubular varieties (try the gallery next time, perhaps) – galvanised everyone into action. And for the final rallying before disaster conclusively strikes, this sounded like a magnificent orchestra under a conductor who really knew what he was doing. Not enough, sadly. What a shame to have a last-minute dip in a season which has yielded more wonderful Proms than I’ve heard in any previous year.

Comments

Just out of interest, where were you sitting? I was up in the choir stalls, and the string sound from there was wonderful. Still, I feel that Daniel tries too hard sometimes with his conducting, and it doesn't get him the required results. With the Vienna Philharmonic, you really don't need to dig in with the conducting. Maybe a lack freedom in his style prevented this.

In the stalls, to the left. The acoustics always take some adjusting to (and I should have gone down into the Arena more often - but it was frequently packed). Yet from my usual post there I can certainly say that many other orchestras, most recently for me the BBC Symphony Orchestra under Karina Canellakis, sounded a lot more characterful - especially the woodwind - if not as sumptuous at times. You may well be right about the difference in the string sound from various 'coigns of vantage', though.

I agree with you about the woodwind though-they didn't always shine as soloists, and in Mahler he really gives them the opportunity to. The horns were fabulous as you said, but in parts I wanted more from the trombones and trumpets, and less from the Tuba-for my ear the sound wasn't quite 'naughty' enough if you get what I mean.

Seating matters at RAH with a full ensemble. Skipped my Arena promming ticket to attend with my wife booking late secured 2 circle tickets, half way the tier, furthest from the stage. Judging by comments, turned out to be best seats in the house. Everything gelled, perfect balance and amazing clarity. A memorable evening. Well done Vienna Phil and congratulations to Daniel Harding.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters