tue 08/04/2025

Maria di Rohan, Royal Festival Hall | reviews, news & interviews

Maria di Rohan, Royal Festival Hall

Maria di Rohan, Royal Festival Hall

Elder and the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment produce the goods

So many 19th-century opera plots park themselves on fertile historical ground, amid all the colour, character and juice you could ever want, and then spend three hours picking at some anaemic daisies at the edges. It was a worry last night as I watched Donizetti’s Maria di Rohan in concert at the Royal Festival Hall.  By sidestepping the heavyweight power players of Louis XIII’s reign, the eminently operatic figures of Cardinal Richelieu (endlessly alluded to) and Marie de Medici, weren’t we also sidestepping the juice? Thankfully, not. But we did have to wait until the second half for it to flow.

Despite a cavernous back-story – expounded on in irritating detail in the programme notes – and a love triangle as complicated as a cat’s cradle, the core of Donizetti’s 1843 opera is tightly plotted. Maria di Rohan, a lady-in-waiting, finds herself stuck between two courtly lovers: one true love (Riccardo) and one marriage of convenience (Enrico). Trysts, duels, honour and politics flow forth. Tension is ratcheted up. Then released, in classic operatic fashion with the return of an incriminating love letter. 
What makes all this more than just a bit of histrionic fluff on the great wall-to-wall carpet of early 19th-century Italian opera is the injection of a certain amount of psychological realism to proceedings. Maria’s delusions, hopes and fears are captured in detail by Donizetti in several rich arias, which Krassimira Stoyanova exploited to great emotional effect. Enrico’s anger, too, is complex, darkly sarcastic, passively aggressive and familiar, and saw a vocally troubled Christopher Purves storm back into form at just the right time. It sets up a classic Donizettian finale: a trio in meltdown, psychologically, physically and vocally.
The only problem with such an intrinsically theatrical and intensely character-driven piece like this is that it is almost impossible to pull off in concert. There are so many dramatic possibilities that, without a director, you’re left with a jumble of jigsaw pieces, all interesting, but ill fitting. The quality of the music-making, however, was of such a standard as to sweep away any concern about the consistency of the dramatic line.
For much of the first half, with the boys yet to hit their stride, a lot of confused plotting and only one, admittedly stunning, aria from Stoyanova, the interest mainly lay with Mark Elder and the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment. It was model playing: sharp and tight when necessary, but also long-lined too. For an orchestra so addicted to a rough-edged period clipping and cutting, it was impressive to hear such consistent lyricism and tonal beauty.
But the second half was all about the singers, above all the spin and sway of Stoyanova and her opulent sound and the conceited swagger and intensity of Jose Bros’s Riccardo.

Share this article

Comments

The climax of the night was the glorious singing of Stoyanova and Bros. What disappointed was the conductor's approach which is very far from the Donizetti's bel canto. If the CD version is the same as what we heard on the 7th November night - Mark Elder's version will not be perfect!

Having treasured the complete recording of the Paris version with Marianna Nicolescu and Giuseppe Morino conducted by Massimo De Bernart i was disappointed by the Opera Rara performance conducted by Mark Elder. The Grand duet finale at the end of Act Two was completely ruined for me by Elder and his singers. They rushed the whole thing into a mad scramble instead of building it up slowly and intensely as Massimo de Bernart does on the Martina Franca performance. His singers have to be heard to be believed at this point as they rise to the conclusion taking the whole finale into the stratosphere. This for me is one of the most exciting moments in the whole Donizetti canon . I was waiting for this moment and didn't get it. Also i think we should have had the Paris version which gives Maria a bigger show piece number using the cabaletta originally assigned to the tenor in the second act. It makes a better effect when sung by the soprano.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters