The Tunnel: Sabotage, Sky Atlantic | reviews, news & interviews
The Tunnel: Sabotage, Sky Atlantic
The Tunnel: Sabotage, Sky Atlantic
Franglais 'tecs battle baffling epidemic of Euro-crime
The pampered bureaucrats who commission television drama have suffered from tunnel vision for years. Today a thriller series must feature at least four of the following: a family in peril; a dysfunctional investigator; foreign baddies; terrorism; cybercrime; a Chinese connection; striking camera angles and colour filters; moody music; and, above all, a pervasive feeling of dread.
The Tunnel: Sabotage, which began on Sky Atlantic last night (with all episodes now available via Sky Box Sets), has the blooming lot. The first series, a cross-channel version of The Bridge, closely echoed its Swedish predecessor. This time, though, writer Ben Richards has been given a freer rein and he certainly comes flying out of the starting gate.
Thank people, praise good work and remember colleagues' birthdays
Passports, a university scroll and two people – still in their airline seats – are washed up on a chilly beach. A happy couple and their daughter are attacked in their car on board a tunnel train. The bride in a marriage of convenience is quickly gang-raped. Welcome to Britain.
Meanwhile, à travers la Manche, Elise (Clémence Poésy) is training to be Commander Wasserman since Olivier, her former boss, has gone off to Counter-Terrorism. Everyone would do well to remember the advice she is given: thank people, praise good work and remember colleagues’ birthdays. Her gaining of emotional intelligence may be an old telly trope by now but the way Poésy plays it – her blue eyes and blonde hair softening Elise’s verbal brutality – is sheer, um, poetry.
Back in Blighty, Karl Roebuck (Stephen Dillane or, if you prefer, Stannis Baratheon), still grief-stricken by the death of his son, is working in Child Protection. The discovery of the little girl – mute with shock – last seen in the back of her parents’ car reunites the odd couple, and the air is soon heavy with a sense of unfinished business. The high-ups are keen to entice Roebuck back to CID: “You’re a clever See You Next Tuesday.”
Further relief from the doom and gloom is provided by William Ash, a character actor who has long deserved greater recognition (Jack Stubbs from Soldier, Soldier now has grey in his hair!). He plays “real detective” Boleslaw Borowski, aka BB, a cheeky chappie with Polish blood and a glint in his eye, whose attempts to explain Cockney rhyming slang to Elise and Louise, her foxy female sidekick, are hilarious. “Will you fuck him?” Elise asks her lucky friend. “We’ll start with fish and chips…”
And so – spoiler alerts are for sissies – the passengers and crew of the plane destined to plunge into the channel – hijacked by hackers on the ground (led by the mute moppet’s father who has already shot his wife!) – are gradually assembled: a human rights lawyer, a kindly sex trafficker, a pair of honeymooners and a “beautiful boy”. Karl flips when he catches a rescuer taking pictures of the corpses with his mobile and nearly kills him. For a moment it’s as if we’re watching Game of Phones.
A very promising opener then. Shame the actual crashdown, coming after a sequence of genuine terror, was straight out of Thunderbirds.
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
Series one was relatively
I couldn't have put your
I couldn't have put your comment better. They are my thoughts too. I didn't know the credentials of the writer, but they fit perfectly. I have become increasingly annoyed by Karl's wife and her cliched character. She is a real distraction and the PC angles re fracking, Islam etc make a potentially excellent series barely watchable
My thoughts as well.Still
My thoughts as well.
Still enjoying it though but hate all the p.c. b******t.
This wasn't nearly as evident in the first series.
just watched the whole
just watched the whole series. It was excellent. One of the best things I've seen in ages. Very exciting and well acted with a complex storyline. One of the things I struggle with when watching dramas these days is a lack of character development so I lose interest because I don't care about the characters. Not so with the tunnel. Absolutely brilliant.
I agree with
I agree with Progressivemediabias. I saw the Breivick copycat massacre coming a mile away. The wooden stereotypes at the youth interfaith gathering, spouting cliched polemic. The tokens from each of the Abrahamic religions selected for slaughter. I think I saw the Jewish token being gunned down, wearing full praying regalia of a Tallit. Why would he have been wearing it? Why would the Jewish youth earlier seen reading Jewish Socialist on the coach be wearing a kippa? And being given feeble lines to argue the case for Israel, which are put down with withering scorn by the Muslim girl. Who is the only one given full voice, in her address to the group, where she declaims that Islamist terror has nothing to do with the religion, just ignorance and poverty, while the Jewish socialist and the cheeky French girl in the audience look suitably remorseful. The French girl who earlier dissed the hijab is left tearfully caressing the bloodstained hijab. And what was the mention of Norman Finkelstein all about? The assistant of the Human Rights judge was handed a book by him, to which he said: Good, I will read it and then go online to debate with him.