Help keep arts journalism alive.

We’re rebuilding theartsdesk to secure it as a bastion of real culture writing in the face of algorithmic recommendations and AI slop. Your participation is absolutely vital to this - subscribe today and be part of this movement.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY 

Seberg review - lightweight script, heavyweight performance

Kristen Stewart dazzles in this glitzy, puddle-deep account of Jean Seberg

share this article

Kristen Stewart as Hollywood icon Jean Seberg

It’s 1968, and Seberg leaves her husband, Romain Gary (Yvan Attal) and son, Alexandre (Gabriel Sky) for an audition in Hollywood. She seems happy to be going. Touching down in LAX she joins a group of black activists, led by Hakim Jamal (Anthony Mackie), and offers up a black power salute. Her intentions are unclear. Is this an act of solidarity in the fight for racial equality or a publicity stunt? It’s hard to tell, but it’s caught the attention of the FBI, and there are far reaching consequences.

Rachel Morrison’s crisp, elegant camera work and Jahmin Assa’s lavish production design, add an element of charm, but really, it’s Stewart that you should see Seberg for. Despite the soap opera script from Anna Waterhouse and Joe Shrapnel, Stewart elevates what’s on the page (and there isn’t much) to something quite sublime. She captures the essence of a woman driven to the edge by the relentless persecution from the powers that be.Kristen Stewart in SebergThe ultimate problem is that the script, and Australian director Benedict Andrews don’t know where the focus of the story is. Is it Seberg? Or perhaps Jack O’Connell’s fictionally, morally conscious FBI agent Jack Solomon? We get a tantalising diversion into the perspective of Dorothy Jamal (the brilliant Zazie Beetz), the wife of Jamal who discovers that her husband and Seberg have been having an affair.

Seberg never gets to grips with the complexity of the time, be that Hoover’s abuse of power authorising extreme operations to those he deemed "un-American" or the Civil Rights Movement. Even when it dabbles in the perils of celebrity platforms and the power of the press (or rather the gossip columnist), it’s shallow and simplistic.

The intention is there, but the execution is lacking, but thankfully Stewart’s skill as an actor is so potent that for all these flaws your attention will still be held.

@JosephDAWalsh

Stewart elevates what’s on the page to something quite sublime

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

more film

John Schlesinger's vibrant tragicomedy returns
Farce and joy in Eighties Paris in a funny, feelgood French hit
A unique hybrid of fact and philosophical fiction
An old-fashioned 'dad' movie shows how a scientist rescued the Allied invasion of France from disaster
Hugh Jackman stars as a Robin Hood who regrets his bloody career
Hidden gem in Bogie's 50s filmography offers excitement plus psychological depth
Grant Gee's first feature refuses to play by biopic rules
Thirty-five years after its original release, a timely revival of James Cameron's blockbuster
The Spanish master asks: Can a wilfully dull film be worth watching?
Gregg Araki returns. And he’s still obsessed about sex
Ambitious, intermittently brilliant anti-war epic with a starry cast