Who Wants to be a Millionaire? ITV1 | reviews, news & interviews
Who Wants to be a Millionaire? ITV1
Who Wants to be a Millionaire? ITV1
A zippier format against the clock works, but the touchy-feely element is off-putting
"Welcome to the new-look, high-risk, high-speed show,” said presenter Chris Tarrant at the top of the programme. Well, sort of new-look; the opening titles are new (although they still haven't managed to put the question mark in the logo), but the music is the same and the set appears to have had no more than a dust down since the last series. But let’s not quibble, as producers Celador have indeed rung the changes and in doing so have given the long-running show a much needed fillip.
And so to the revamped UK edition. Taking their lead from several international versions of the franchise, the producers have dispensed with the “fastest finger first” round; contestants are now chosen before the show starts and so we immediately get down to it. Last night’s debutant was Karen, an orthoptist from Liverpool. For her benefit and ours Tarrant explained the new system: the first seven questions are now against the clock, with 15 seconds to answer the first two questions once they - not the multiple-choice answers, mind - appear on screen; a more generous 30 seconds is given for questions up to £50,000. Thereafter, questions are no longer against the clock and an extra lifeline, the “switch” (where, if they haven’t a clue about the question on screen, they can ask for a replacement) is added.
So the new format evens the contest between people sweating under studio lights and the know-alls at home because now everybody has the same time to answer, and it makes it fairer for nervous contestants who previously had time to talk themselves into using a lifeline unnecessarily when they knew the answer all along. It adds to the competitive element for viewers, too, as the show’s appeal for most of its fans - and I am one of them - is not in following the fortunes of contestants but in pitting one’s own knowledge against theirs. And, of course, feeling immensely smug when those in the studio are stumped but we know the answer, d’uh.
The producers may have made these adjustments to make the programme snappier, but for me the real bonus of “the relentless ticking of the big, bad clock” as Tarrant put it, is that we would have less time for his annoying, repetitive twaddle - “Are you sure?”, “Final answer?”, “How do you know that?”, “You could lose 19 grand”, etc, etc - which I’ve always thought was immensely off-putting for the contestants. He did his best to slip them in, however...
A worrying development, though, is Celador’s introduction of a touchy-feely element. They must have have been watching ITV stablemate Simon Cowell's X-Factor and its endless stream of contestants’ tear-jerking back stories (however hyperbolised) and thought: “We’ll have some of that.” So last night’s second contestant was Dave from Yorkshire, a retired fireman who is now the carer of a 20-year-old man with Down’s syndrome, whose mother died of cancer last year. After Dave had correctly answered two questions, they dropped in film of his wife, daughter and the young man wishing him good luck. What was the purpose of this other than to bring a lump to our throats? It’s not a show about who deserves money, surely? If that’s the case then the programme makers are rich enough just to give a cheque to those who in their opinion warrant it most, without putting them through the torment of answering questions under pressure. Besides, how unsettling for poor old Dave, who went on to answer the £50,000 question incorrectly and left with only a grand.
The zippier format certainly works, but if they are going to turn the show into another slushfest, I’ll switch, thanks.
- Who Wants to be a Millionaire? continues on ITV1 every Tuesday
- Watch this episode again on itvPlayer
- Find Who Wants to be a Millionaire? on Amazon
Explore topics
Share this article
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
more TV












Comments
...