Infamous review - Bonnie and Clyde for the digital age fails to deliver | reviews, news & interviews
Infamous review - Bonnie and Clyde for the digital age fails to deliver
Infamous review - Bonnie and Clyde for the digital age fails to deliver
A violent exploration of the perils of social media
Like a sub-par Natural Born Killers for Gen Z, director-screenwriter Joshua Caldwell’s latest film, featuring Disney-child-star-turned-porn-director Bella Thorne, tackles the perils of social media like a parent trying to navigate TikTok.
Arielle (Thorne) is a provocative Florida teen whose sole desire is to become famous any way she can. After a video of Arielle beating up a girl in a night club goes viral, she sees her road to stardom lies in making videos of violent acts to boost her online profile.
Having dragged reluctant ex-con Dean (Jake Manley) along for the ride, the duo hit the road, crossing state lines as they knock off drugstores and share the videos online, earning them a massive following. It’s Bonnie and Clyde (and they describe themselves as such), only they’ve ditched the fedoras and pencil skirts in favour of iPhones, neon bikinis, and Hawaiian shirts. On the face of it, Infamous should fit neatly next to Harmony Korine’s Spring Breakers and Sofia Coppola’s The Bling Ring, especially with its candy-coloured aesthetic. However, Korine and Coppola captured the anguish of a disenfranchised generation in a sympathetic and timely way. Caldwell borrows the aesthetic but leaves the insight behind.
Much of what Caldwell tackles was beaten to the punch by the remarkable Queen and Slim, meaning we’ve not only seen it before, we’ve seen it done much better. Both deal with timely themes, but the approach couldn’t be more different. Queen and Slim managed to wrangle US racial tensions together with a classic road movie trope wrapped in a gripping crime drama, as well as exploring social media. Infamous meanwhile is left floundering by comparison, full of id-driven characters driven to destruction by their own narcissism, leaving little room for the audience to feel any sympathy for their plight.
Blunt social commentary is casually tossed into the mix, including Florida’s gun laws and the pointless fantasy of online life. Luckily, Thorne rescues the film from being a complete mess. She gives a performance that captures Arielle’s unhinged persona, lending more substance to the cigarette-paper thin screenplay than it deserves. But even Thorne can’t convince of us of some of the groan-inducing character motivations, like being angry that her mom named her after The Little Mermaid.
The action sequences do have some good pacing, and the visceral violence captures the consequences of Arielle’s idiotic actions. Yet, the final bank heist sequence, which also opens the film, has to be one of the dullest committed to screen, only made worse when a character announces they are in a Mexican stand-off as though we can’t already see what’s happening on screen.
We’ve seen it before, we’ve seen it done better, and even with Thorne’s enthusiastic performance, Infamous remains as relevant to Gen Z as MySpace.
rating
Share this article
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment