wed 27/11/2024

Prom 6, BBC Philharmonic, Davis review - a bracing pair of British symphonies | reviews, news & interviews

Prom 6, BBC Philharmonic, Davis review - a bracing pair of British symphonies

Prom 6, BBC Philharmonic, Davis review - a bracing pair of British symphonies

Vaughan Williams convinces more than Tippett in two committed performances

Sir Andrew Davis conducts the BBC Philharmonic at Prom 6© BBC/Chris Christodoulou

The ferocity of Tuesday's heat wasn’t reflected in the pleasantly air-conditioned Royal Albert Hall – the coolest I had felt all day – but was in the intense playing of the BBC Philharmonic, in a pair of knotty and urgent British symphonies.

The programming had a neat simplicity: the fourth symphonies of Vaughan Williams and Tippett. It was also slightly thin – just over an hour of music which, even allowing for having to give way for a late-night Dido and Aeneas, could have squeezed in something else.

Neither symphony is easy listening – and this, combined with the heat and travel chaos, meant a small house. But Sir Andrew Davis proved a sure guide through the thickets, making sense of the often dense textures while also finding space in the occasional clearings.Sir Andrew Davis conducts the BBC Philharmonic in Prom 6Vaughan Williams’s Fourth Symphony was premiered in 1935 and he famously said of it: “I don’t know whether I like it, but it’s what I meant.” It’s very different in tone and means from the symphonies either side and is often seen as reacting to the political developments in Europe at the time, an interpretation RVW resisted.

It’s certainly full of angst and tension, right from the off. The first five minutes are loud, turbulent and dissonant, the BBC Philharmonic (pictured above by Chris Christodoulou) finding an insistent momentum. But, throughout, it was the quiet passages, hard won, that had the more striking impact. The ending of the first movement was captivating, as were the snaking woodwind solos of the second, lines circling each other in tentative counterpoint.

The third movement shook off the day’s lethargy in bracing rhythmic asymmetry, a bouncing bassoon solo (Roberto Giaccaglia) setting the pace, and the fourth featured a convincingly brass-band swing to the oom-pah opening. The playing throughout was tidy and tight, with Andrew Davis unshowy – and largely still – but weighty where he needed to be.

Davis is closely associated with Tippett’s Fourth (1978), this being his third time conducting it at the Proms (out of a total of five outings). He was a sure hand at the tiller here in a piece that demanded different skills: the music is more diverse, more sectional, so the need is to somehow pull it all together. (In a brilliant and informative programme note, Tippett’s biographer Oliver Soden suggests that Tippett, an inveterate TV watcher, is “channel-hopping”.)CJ Neale provides "breathing effects" for Tippett's Fourth SymphonyThe symphony is a birth-to-death account of a life, replete with a “breathing effect”, realised here by CJ Neale (pictured above), seated within the orchestra. Tippett was often considered “trendy” and perhaps a bit gauche in his incorporation of, for example, electric guitars into his scores. The breathing effect is odd but does bind the sections together. At the beginning it is mainly creepy, when it is probably meant to be revelatory – but the ending, a dying person’s rasp, was actually quite moving.

The piece is generally quite stern but, as in the Vaughan Williams, this means the lighter moments have the more impact. Jennifer Galloway’s oboe solo during the slow movement was at once innocent and knowing, and in the final section, amid the hustle and bustle there is suddenly a magical passage for strings and percussion and all is forgiven. Does it all hang together? For me, not quite, but Davis and the BBC Phil made as persuasive a case as could be made.

@bernardlhughes

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters