'Singers must act better than ever before' | reviews, news & interviews
'Singers must act better than ever before'
'Singers must act better than ever before'
OperaGlassWorks collaborate with singers from the start. Director Selina Cadell explains
"Vary the song, O London, change!" sings Tom Rakewell as he tires of the great metropolis. WH Auden and Chester Kallman's libretto for Stravinsky's The Rake's Progress strikes a chord with me too. London has magnificent opera but, at the top end, it comes at a price. Not just for the audience but for the singers. Lavish sets and costumes force historical productions into revivals.
There is a case now for change.
With the current trend for broadcasting productions in cinemas (often live), singers must act better than ever before. Now the label "elitist", which has dogged the art form, has a chance to re-invent itself. Because music is not elitist. It speaks to something way beyond the brain, and, hence, must be offered freely without constraint. ''Disband your notes, and let them range," continues Tom Rakewell.
Yes. This is why my co-producer, Eliza Thompson, and myself have set up a production company, OperaGlass Works, to try and initiate a different model. Singers are offered the chance to collaborate from the start. Rob Murray (playing Tom) and I germinated the seeds of this particular project several years ago. We rehearse for five weeks, allowing singers to work as thoroughly as actors do on the text.
Auden's dense text echoes those of the 18th century (when the opera is set) where word was the sole currency of communication, and character existed only in the language. No back story. No offstage world. Only the words. Everything linked to what has been said before. Specificity is essential. (Pictured below: Robert Murray and Jonathan Lemalu)Here, Tom is paralysed by Shadow's request for him to guess the cards:
"I cannot think. I dare not wish."
Tom's character, hitherto in the opera, has been led by wishes. Thinking is not his strong point. Shadow picks up the word "wish" (musically too) and offers him a chance to think on who he would wish for now:
"Let wish be thought and think on one to name / You wish in all your fear could rule the game / Instead of Shadow."
The Devil (Shadow)'s arch enemy is Love, and his encouragement to Tom to name his rival is more dangerous than he realises. Shadow's use of the word "one" here, perhaps inadvertently, also prompts Tom to remember his earlier line: "One, only one, and of her, I dare not think." This is similar to "I dare not wish" too. "Her" refers to his love Anne. Thus he finds the answer to the first clue: "the Queen of Hearts".
When singers are not encouraged to listen and inhabit the words truthfully here, the overall effect is a generalised sense of villainy, paying into our low expectation of understanding the words of an opera. I have discovered that when a singer understands and believes what they are singing, as if it is happening to them, they take a bigger breath. When this happens they hit the centre of the note, and the tone changes. Nothing is filtered then. No excess energy, just synergy. The second obvious result from authentic ownership of language is that the feeling, whatever it is, appears to be more "present".
OperaGlass Works will empower singers to integrate acting and singing, producing delightful storytelling in intimate spaces. We will bring excellent opera to new audiences, at lower prices. Acting is simply the art of believing what you say, or sing, at the time that you are saying, or singing it. Maria Callas said, 'If the thought is right, the notes will follow." They do.
- The Rake's Progress is at Wilton's Music Hall from 17 to 25 November
- Read more First Person articles on theartsdesk
Explore topics
Share this article
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment