Founder rate ends 9th September.

We’re rebuilding theartsdesk to secure the future of real arts journalism. Be part of it by subscribing: if you do it now, the founders’ rate of just £40 yearly is yours FOR LIFE!

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

If So, Then Yes, Jermyn Street Theatre

First play in 30 years from the legendary absurdist N F Simpson

share this article

Weird scenes: Paul Copley as Reg and Roddy Maude-Roxby as Geoffrey Wythenshaw
Idilu Sukan

N F Simpson is a legendary absurdist playwright of 1950s and 1960s vintage. But while his 1957 debut, A Resounding Tinkle, got a revival some three years ago at the Donmar, he was widely believed to have given up writing more than 30 years ago. After all, he has a back catalogue of comic classics, and he celebrated his 91st birthday in January this year! But, true to form, the veteran humorist has surprised us once more. Last night, the Jermyn Street Theatre, a fringe venue a stone’s throw from Piccadilly Circus, premiered his brand new play.

If So, Then Yes is a surreal comedy about a day in the life of one Geoffrey Wythenshaw, an octogenarian who begins to dictate his autobiography in the comfort of a retirement home for the well heeled. The trouble is, he makes precious little progress because he finds himself constantly bothered by other residents, odd visitors and members of staff. Some come to ask his advice, others simply want to pass the time of day.

The consistent oddity of the language is mildly deranging

Simpson’s style is instantly familiar: it’s the kind of English whimsy that immediately reminds you of the fact that, in the past, his work was an influence on British comedy, most obviously on Peter Cook, Dudley Moore and the Monty Python team. It’s a fizzing concoction of paradoxical wit and surreal absurdities, with a dash of philosophy thrown in for good measure. It mixes passionate inconsequentiality with good-natured speculation, and creates a sense that language is unstable and fugitive.

But don’t expect much in the way of plot. Geoffrey Wythenshaw does some dictating to Lorna; Reg, a new resident, pops in; the cleaners arrive and gossip; and there’s a fête in the grounds of the home. Some of the material is hilariously surreal: a young woman contemplates an operation that will turn her into a walrus; a family time-travels to a world ruled by dinosaurs; the role of tallow in the creation of the American Constitution is discussed; an insect sanctuary is visited.

Peeking out from all this craziness are Simpson’s main concerns: the need for belief or faith, and the difficulty of finding anything to believe in. There’s quite a lot of religious speculation and a sense that God is unknowable, while at the same time our urge to know him, her or it is also acknowledged. Then there’s a fair bit of satire on language, gossip and cliché. Human communication is put under the microscope.

The effect of the play is genuinely unsettling. On the one hand, it feels like a trip into the past, with many references, from Sartre to Exchange & Mart, to an older post-war culture; on the other hand, the consistent oddity of the language is mildly deranging. It’s all very jovial but behind the high jinks there’s a ghastly sense that people are talking in a language that no one understands. It feels a bit like having a partial stroke. Or a radio tuning in, and tuning out.

For the Presence theatre company, director Simon Usher fields a good cast, led by Roddy Maude-Roxby as Geoffrey Wythenshaw (who was in the original production of Simpson’s One Way Pendulum in 1959). Here, he is the tentative, gently avuncular still centre of a maddening world. There’s good support and some cameos from (to name but two) Di Botcher as a Welsh cleaner and Paul Copley as Reg. But although Simpson’s scepticism about the conformity of modern society feels just right, the play drags a little in the long second half and a feeling of mild derangement shades into irritation. Still, Simon Usher should be praised for at least trying to widen the current narrow repertoire of British theatre.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Name that you would like to appear as the author of the comment
It mixes passionate inconsequentiality with good-natured speculation, creating a sense that language is unstable and fugitive

rating

0

explore topics

share this article

Help secure the future of arts journalism

In this era of algorithmic recommendation, opaquely sponsored content and AI slop, theartsdesk’s mission to preserve real journalistic and critical values has never been more important.

If you like what you see here, please join us 
in this mission.

Subscribing to the site will help us in our coming 
redesign and expansion.


If you do this before the 31st August this will be at our guaranteed founder’s rate: 
your subs will never increase again.

Subscribe now for £5 per month. 
or yearly for just £40.

Or if you simply want to support us with a one-off donation, you can do so here.

more theatre

New play about love and loneliness in London has terrific gender and genre fluidity
Not everything works but, with this unbreakable musical, it doesn't need to
Simon Stone's latest reversioning of a classic is a muddled misfire
Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point