fri 22/11/2024

Manon, Royal Opera | reviews, news & interviews

Manon, Royal Opera

Manon, Royal Opera

Massenet's delicate tale of a pleasure-loving girl in a man's world needs more heart

Material girl? Ermonela Jaho as Massenet's Manon LescautAll images by Bill Cooper for the Royal Opera

Massenet had just two lingering thoughts about Manon when he wrote his memoirs in 1910, a quarter-century after the opera's first performance. First, he enjoyed reminding himself how many times it had been performed (a staggering 763 by the time he finished the memoirs).

He also stressed that the choice of the singer to play Manon herself was crucial, needing an "artist who suited this role just as I wanted, and who could represent perfidious and dear Manon with all the heart that I had placed in her," with the right "qualities of vocal seduction".

In both these respects, this Covent Garden revival of Laurent Pelly's production is swimming against the tide. Manon is not the box office draw it once was. The performances in this run are also all on weekdays, they start at 6.30pm, and finish a few minutes short of four hours later. Furthermore, the original run's star soprano Anna Netrebko - around whom the production, shared with New York, Milan and Toulouse, and first heard here in 2010, was built - has left the cast, and been replaced on this run by two less well-known singers, the Albanian Ermonela Jaho for the first five performances, then American Ailyn Pérez for the last two.

Ermenela Jaho as Manon photographed by Bill Cooper for the Royal OperaJaho (pictured right) received a very warm accolade at the end of the show from the opening night house, but in solo passages occasionally sounded as if she were "marking" the part for a rehearsal rather than fully singing out. Only towards the end did I get the sense that she was connecting with the audience.

The production doesn't help communication. Laurent Pelly has talked about the detached perspective he likes to bring to everything he does, saying in an interview that "the critical gaze is always the backdrop to my creations" and that "I look at the world and at people through that filter and hold it up to the public as a mirror." That approach of distancing a creation has its limitations with a work which wears its heart on its sleeve. Characters are disappearing where they should be imposing themselves. Was it my imagination, or was American tenor Matthew Polenzani often required to walk backwards and upstage?

Among the minor roles, two in particular left a strong impression: Alastair Miles as Des Grieux (senior) was not just in fine voice; he brought a sureness of touch to every phrase. Christophe Mortagne played the demanding character part of Guillot with panache. His progression during the evening from a ridiculous buffo, you're-not-kidding-anyone suitor through to an implacable man seeking vengeance by the end was expertly handled.

Chantal Thomas's designs, evoking the Belle Époque, the time of the opera's composition, and reminiscent of the Parisian paintings of Jean Béraud, are beautiful. The approach is historically coherent too. There is a lot of Zola's Rougon-Macquart in general, and of Nana (published in 1880, four years before Manon) in particular, in Meilhac and Gille's view of the world in their adaptation of Abbé Prevost's novel.

The final scene looks to be set anachronistically on an airport runway, but the desolation works well. Jorge Lavelli used to pull off that effect expertly, letting the bleakness of an empty stage home the audience's attention in on the lonely plight of the protagonists.

Scene from Massenet's Manon by Bill Cooper for the Royal OperaI have to say that one other anachronism completely infuriated me: Pelly and Thomas have made the dress, the pout and the gesturing of Act IV Scene 1 into a shameless, direct lift from Madonna's Material Girl video of 1984. That, surely, is a misjudgment.

The orchestra under conductor Emmanuel Villaume was having a very good night indeed. Perfect woodwind tuning, balance and shaping are not things which a listener can or should ever take for granted on a first night. Villaume also gives himself and his singers plenty of freedom and allows phrase length to flow, to follow rhetoric and gesture, rather than trying to assert a pulse. The slower passages hinting at Rameau and Lully were brought out quite beautifully. The climaxes at the end of scenes grew inexorably, with the one at the end of Act III Scene 2 stupendous. The chorus (pictured above) were also on fine form, though the production ensured they received embarrassed rather than appreciative applause when the octet of female ballet dancers was bodily removed, legs beating in the air, by men in suits, to an uncertain fate.

This was a solid performance, though with enough of the virtues and high standards of the Royal Opera company on display to make a worthwhile evening. There will be seats to spare, indeed some discounting has aleady started. I was picking up more of a buzz about the prospect of Ailyn Pérez taking up the role later in the run, by which time orchestra and chorus will no doubt also be reaching the heights.

Pelly's approach of distancing a creation has its limitations with a work which wears its heart on its sleeve

rating

Editor Rating: 
3
Average: 3 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

What a beautifully written, beautifully expressed, review. Congratulations.

I don't agree. The critic failed to comment on the beautiful singing of Polenzani. All he mentioned was his name. In addition there were no empty seats on 24th January. I loved the performances and will go again.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters