wed 27/11/2024

Prom 15: Bavarian RSO, Nézet-Séguin review - perfect Beethoven, nuanced Shostakovich | reviews, news & interviews

Prom 15: Bavarian RSO, Nézet-Séguin review - perfect Beethoven, nuanced Shostakovich

Prom 15: Bavarian RSO, Nézet-Séguin review - perfect Beethoven, nuanced Shostakovich

A top partnership hits the heights of engagement and sophistication

Every look has it: the engaging Yannick Nézet-SéguinAll images by Chris Christodoulou

While we wish the great Mariss Jansons a speedy recovery, no-one of sound heart and soul could be disappointed by his substitute for the two Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra Proms, Yannick Nézet-Séguin, whose supreme art is to show the score's construction in the face, with gestures to match.

Some of us, on the other hand, weren't quite so happy that Shostakovich's Fifth replaced a deeper, richer symphony, the mighty Tenth. But Nézet-Séguin was as sure of intent and as attentive to dynamic possibilities in this as he had been in Beethoven's Second, even if the Munich orchestra might not, by very virtue of its sophisticated nature, have been the ideal to take us to the edge of the abyss; it needed work, and it seemed grateful to get it.

What, though, was not to like about the Beethoven? It's such a charmer, but it still needs careful handling, and hours of rehearsal time with the BRSO, unquestionably one of the world's top five among orchestras as Nézet-Séguin is among conductors, must have been spent on split-second changes of light - the way, for instance we seem to have gone back to a recap of the second theme, in the first-movement development, when it suddenly cuts away to a question from the two flutes. From Mozartian charm to Beethoven on proto-Eroica charge was allowed, but within strict bounds. The scherzo had exactly the right lightness in emphasis; the finale was energetic without a hint of bludgeoning, down to the careful judging of the very last chord. BRSO and Nezet Seguin in Prom 15The beauty of the Shostakovich rested with its inner movements. Having left us wanting more edge to the supple string phrasing in the opening progression from sadness to shrill pain and back - though tremolos were fierce and intense - the Bavarians fielded double-bass playing of startling heft at the start of the Mahlerian scherzo, complemented by biting, E flat clarinet-edged woodwind; very individual characterisation, too, from leader Radoslaw Szulc. For the desolate Largo, the one movement that went deep with the Soviet audience’s unspeakable pain in 1937, Nézet-Séguin fashioned divided-string laments on the cusp of audibility, trusting to the Albert Hall to intensify them and draw the 5,000 plus audience in to listen carefully; the numb Orthodox chant at the heart of the lament has never sounded more like a murmuring crowd. Here, too, as in the first movement, first flautist Philippe Boucly was the fine-tuned star of the show; there can’t be a more sensitive principal in any orchestra in the world.

All the more appalling, then, that the faux triumph at the end of the finale has to sweep that all away. Maybe I’m just beyond interest as to whether it’s threatening or celebratory, but this gilded spaciousness seemed like a perfunctory grandeur. So much the worse that instead of a stunned, brief silence, the bravos and the standing ovation followed so immediately. It took the pure, misty waters of the Moscow river at dawn in the Prelude to Musorgsky’s Khovanshchina to wash out the bad taste; an inspired encore on Nézet-Séguin's part, especially since it appeared – I’m assuming, with the last-minute appearance of the celesta a giveaway – in Shostakovich’s glowing orchestration.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters