Alys, Always, Bridge Theatre review - mildly perverse but rather dispiriting | reviews, news & interviews
Alys, Always, Bridge Theatre review - mildly perverse but rather dispiriting
Alys, Always, Bridge Theatre review - mildly perverse but rather dispiriting
Adaptation of Harriet Lane's psychological and satirical bestseller never quite takes off
Okay, so this is the play that will be remembered for the character names that have unusual spellings. As in Alys not Alice, Kyte not Kite, etc.
Like so much in our culture, this is a story about class. Frances is a nobody, a timid thirty-something arts desk sub-editor, who is employed by The Questioner newspaper (any resemblance to The Observer is purely coincidental); by contrast, Laurence is a real somebody, an award-winning novelist and a household name. It's the difference between Poundland and Planet Organic. As Frances is drawn into the Kytes' celebrity world she sees the opportunity to better herself. Like a figure in some Hitchcock film, she starts to imitate Aly's identity, dressing like her, cooking her recipes and changing her hair and make-up. Inevitably, she will end up in Laurence's arms. It's a question not of if, but when.
An invisible ugly duckling turns into a highly visible swan
So this is a kind of belated coming of age story as Frances, an invisible ugly duckling turns into a highly visible swan. To make this metamorphosis she manipulates her way into the Kyte family, using the young daughter Polly as her key, and very soon this pays off. Simply knowing the famous Kytes gives her kudos: at one point she kisses Laurence on the cheek in public — then checks that her boss has seen her. Her opportunism works wonders: at the office she is promoted; she gets to have lunch with the rich and privileged. At the same time, there is something bizarre happening: Frances feels more herself when she pretends to be Alys than when she is simply Frances.
As well as this mildly perverse take on personal identity, which remains regrettably undeveloped, the play — whose story Frances narrates straight to the audience throughout — is a superficial study of truth and lies. At the heart of the plot is a secret that eventually comes out, although I had no sense of dramatic tension because it is not signposted clearly enough. Instead, the chief pleasure of this evening lies in the continuous satirical jibes at journalism and at family life (pictured below). Okay, these bits are quite funny, but they hardly compensate for the slack and rather pedestrian storytelling.
Perhaps the most disheartening thing about the story is that the rich and privileged, especially young Polly, are presented as so silly that Frances's ambition to be one of them must be either foolish, or pathological. Sadly, it's the former. Her happy moments with Polly the airhead show the emptiness of contemporary celebrity, but you do wonder why we should care. I mean Frances succeeds by being manipulative, opportunistic and using her intelligence to deceive other people. It's really hard to admire this will to power: there's a really ugly side to Frances. Which makes it hard to root for her.
So much of the fun of the piece, which reminds me strongly of those vapid West End comedies of the 1950s, lies with incidentals: a cooking metaphor that sums up Frances's manipulative sense of timing; the idea that Frances is always acting, always on show, which is what gives Froggatt's performance a certain frisson. But the whole thing is woefully thin: not only is Frances unsympathetic, but what the piece has to say about creativity is banal, and the absence of tension, of subtlety and of conflict means that the story frequently slackens. And if Frances is a monster of envy she never really lets us see into her dark heart.
Still, Nicholas Hytner's efficient production has a typically effective design by Bob Crowley, whose set fluidly morphs between flats, houses and offices, and Froggatt's acting has the appeal of letting the audience see a kind of elaborate in-joke: she shows us when she is being manipulative, but the other characters can't tell. By contrast, Glenister has neither the charisma nor the darkness to be thoroughly convincing, and his exchanges with Froggatt completely lack the spark of attraction. Of the rest of a large cast, I found Leah Gayer's Polly to be richly annoying and Sylvestra Le Touzel enjoyable to watch as the arts editor. But in the end this story feels like a weak version of a potentially good idea.
rating
Share this article
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment