tue 24/12/2024

Macbeth, Shakespeare's Globe | reviews, news & interviews

Macbeth, Shakespeare's Globe

Macbeth, Shakespeare's Globe

Incoherent vision results in a (Mac)duff production

Smoke and mirrors: Macbeth (Ray Fearon) and Lady Macbeth (Tara Fitzgerald)Bill Knight for theartsdesk

It begins promisingly, a dark Gothic fairy tale – both Grimm and grim. The writhing witches (four, oddly) are summoned from a pile of dead bodies, Stefan Fichert’s eerie puppetry all chopped-up limbs and interchanging demonic heads, hands scuttling across the floor like a spider, and disembodied voices chanting and haunting. Then the spell is broken and “what seem’d corporal melted”.

Unfortunately, that’s also when the air goes out of Iqbal Khan’s lacklustre production, which plods along from one incident to the next without any clear intent. Ray Fearon’s Macbeth is a mellifluous speaker, massaging every syllable of the poetry, but lacks convincing psychological underpinning – he simply acts because the text demands it. As his wife, Tara Fitzgerald is in another version altogether: where he is lofty and declamatory, she is sardonic, naturalistic and too soft-spoken; he rages at the heavens while she gets amusingly tipsy and casually conceals their crimes. It’s a bizarre arranged marriage of wildly contrasting performances, and vague attempts to sex up their relationship fall flat.

Macbeth, Shakespeare's GlobeNeither is noticeably driven by ambition or thirst for power, nor damaged by past tragedy. A tiny tot trots adorably around the stage, representing their lost child, but to no particular end. It’s simultaneously soap-operatic broad – at one point Lady Macbeth throws a drink in her husband’s face – and not bold enough. The nightmarish, otherworldly quality is absent for too long, so that brief reprises, like the summoning of Banquo in a visually interesting riff on “The Tell-Tale Heart”, wind up clashing with an otherwise straightforward rendering. (The witches pictured above)

There are surer supporting performances, with Jermaine Dominique (pictured below by Marc Brenner) a notably charismatic Banquo. He’s a pumped-up warrior, spitting water at the groundlings and banging his shield, and a devoted father, but more visibly seduced by promises of greatness than Fearon’s Macbeth. He puts up a real fight when the assassins come to call, and his absence is sorely felt. Sam Cox transforms the often dull Duncan into a grand, preening luvvie, exceedingly aware that power is a performance, Kerry Gooderson sharply defines the young Fleance and sassy Macduff child, and Jacob Fortune-Lloyd enlivens the second half as a committed Macduff, poleaxed by the news that his family has been slaughtered.

Macbeth, Shakespeare's GlobeBut the standout performance is Nadia Albina as a stand-up comic Porter. She emerges from a sleeping bag, torn fishnets hanging off one foot, and weaves contemporary references into her rants, from the inevitable “To remain or not to remain?” (a joke that rings horribly hollow now) to the naming of Trump as a devil and – winning the hearts of commuters – “Welcome to Hell: mind the gap.” She’s eccentric and licentious, but also shrewd and quick-witted. There’s method to her madness.

In contrast, the drawn-out violence just seems needlessly sadistic, and there’s too much focus on elaborate corpse disposal. Melanie Pappenheim’s singing is evocative, but combined with Joan O’Clery’s velvet costuming, Ciaran Bagnhall's twirly wrought iron, and copious dry ice, it feels like a particularly languorous Eighties music video. Too often, the action is jarringly or even unintentionally funny. One of the more disappointingly conservative offerings in Emma Rice’s new season, but lacking the old-school Globe continuous engagement.

@mkmswain

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters