The World's Greatest Paintings, Channel 5 review - enthusiastic presenter but no dazzling revelations | reviews, news & interviews
The World's Greatest Paintings, Channel 5 review - enthusiastic presenter but no dazzling revelations
The World's Greatest Paintings, Channel 5 review - enthusiastic presenter but no dazzling revelations
Andrew Marr subjects Leonardo's masterpiece to banality and cliché
Andrew Marr’s art show is a lot of fun, although engulfed in almost overwhelming banality and cliché. Our enthusiastic presenter is a self-confessed addict of art.
The “greatest” in the title is misleading, as this handful of the world’s best-known paintings are not necessarily the best. Aesthetically, the jury has long been out as to the quality of this early 16th century portrait. Her enigmatic smile fascinates, but she only leapt into mega-fame when she vanished, stolen from the Louvre by one of its own employees in 1911 and finally returned in 1914. The retelling of the theft was fascinating, but the only one of the quintet of experts brought in who managed to transcend any obvious comments was a charmer from the Bibliothéque Nationale who showed us the breathless newspaper reporting which put our heroine on the front page of every publication worldwide.
The Louvre is the biggest and famous art gallery in the world, we were told, visited by nearly 10 million annually. If they all came on the same day the queue would stretch to Moscow. Eight out of 10 queueing are here to see one thing, the Mona Lisa, and the biggest crowds happened in the three years of her absence when the public queued to see the empty space in the gallery.
So what is the secret of the Mona Lisa? Da Vinci’s talents were recognised by his family – he was born in 1452 in a small town near Florence – and he spent 11 years in the studio workshop of the leading artist Verrocchio; Leonardo was a master craftsman from the age of 20. He experimented with the new technology of oil paint, and his use of perspective in his imagery was innovative, even revolutionary, as seen in his mural of The Last Supper in Milan. Leonardo declared that anatomy for a painter was what grammar is for a writer, and he dissected bodies in the mortuary of the central Florentine hospital. He saw painting as remaking nature.
There has long been a mystery as to the Mona Lisa’s identity, but a consensus emerged in 2005. This was due to a note found in a German library claiming her to be Lisa del Giocondo, the wife of a trader in silks, textiles, possibly even slaves, and a business associate of Leonardo’s father.
Art and science were for Leonardo inseparable. His study of optics enabled Leonardo to portray her eyes as though they are following the spectator round the gallery. His studies of muscles allowed him to present her with her enigmatic smile, and she is not portrayed straight on but slightly sideways. It was the closest thing to naturalism in a portrait yet seen, and influenced young Raphael. Leonardo himself tweaked the painting throughout the rest of his life. He could not let it go.
By 1517 Leonardo went to work for Françoise I in Paris, and after the painter died in Amboise in 1519, his assistant sold the Mona Lisa to the French king. It entered the Louvre with the rest of the royal collection after the French Revolution. Until the theft in 1911 she was but one masterpiece among many.
Those who know something about the subject won’t have found much enlightenment, and those who know little will not have learned enough. Still, it was a thrill just to look at the Mona Lisa without the crowds, and to stroll through sunny Florence. And what carried us through was Marr’s fandom, and his passionate attachment and admiration of his subject.
rating
Explore topics
Share this article
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
Hi I watched the first three