Mullova, Hallé, Elder, Bridgewater Hall, Manchester | reviews, news & interviews
Mullova, Hallé, Elder, Bridgewater Hall, Manchester
Mullova, Hallé, Elder, Bridgewater Hall, Manchester
No dancers but much drama in Daphnis et Chloé, plus ravishing Russian violin
Sir Mark Elder has a penchant for taking on large-scale works in Manchester, from operatic concert performances of Wagner and Verdi to Hollywood musicals. Following that line, he kicked off the new Hallé season with Ravel’s Daphnis et Chloé ballet score in its entirety, described by the composer as “a vast musical fresco faithful to the Greece of my dreams”. We are used to hearing the odd suite, but rarely the whole work.
It calls for large forces for the three parts with 13 scenes and lasts about an hour. Commissioned by Diaghilev, it evokes the glory days of the Ballets Russes and that first performance in Paris in 1912, conducted by Pierre Monteux and featuring Nijinsky and Karsavina in the title roles.
Here, of course, we have the ballet without dancers and a chorus without words. The Choreographic Symphony in three parts, 1909-12, takes us back to the starting point where Ravel began to work on the commission, confronting the dual challenge of religion and eroticism as the love story of the goatherd Daphnis and the shepherdess Chloé unfolds.
The atmosphere is quickly created with echoing horns, followed by a wordless chorus. A flute evokes Pan and the nymphs, giving way to the horn theme for the lovers. The themes are established, the pastoral scene set. Elder inspired a masterful account of the piece from the magical opening to the bacchanalian abandon of the end. He brought out the scale of the work with its colour and rhythms, often sounding like the score for some epic movie, with the chorus sounding like one of Hollywood’s heavenly choirs. And the nuances were all there, from the whispering wind machine to the clash of brass in the pirates’ ferocious War Dance. This is, after all, dance music, both gentle and animalistic, meditative and erotic. Hearing it in isolation, without distraction, is to more keenly appreciate Ravel’s instrumental characterisation as lovers, pirates, satyrs, nymphs and shepherds parade before us. Every instrument has a distinctive role.
Preceding the Ravel we had Shostakovich’s First Violin Concerto. It is many years since I first had the thrill of hearing its dedicatee, the late great David Oistrakh, play with the Hallé. Even he found his friend’s concerto testing. Indeed, the story goes that he got the composer to rewrite some of the solo work for orchestra “so at least I can wipe the sweat off my brow”. Here, we saw soloist Victoria Mullova (pictured) wiping the sweat off her neck, face and fiddle.
She gave an exhilarating account of the work, full of passion, precision and power. She showed real understanding of the dramatic shaping the concerto demands, from the deceptively restrained opening Nocturne, played with great delicacy, to the dazzling exuberance of the solo cadenza of the third movement. And in the closing Burlesque we found her skipping along with technical bravura. Elder was alert to her needs, developing the orchestral backing from the early brooding accompaniment to the full throttle of the finale.
This was the first in the Hallé’s season-long survey of Shostakovich’s six concertos for violin, cello, piano and trumpet. With that and the Ravel, the 157th season is up and running with a vengeance.
rating
Explore topics
Share this article
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment