fri 15/11/2024

Southcliffe, Channel 4 | reviews, news & interviews

Southcliffe, Channel 4

Southcliffe, Channel 4

Murder-spree drama is morbid and depressing, but does that make it any good?

Death becomes him: Sean Harris as the murderous loner Stephen Morton

The last time I noticed Sean Harris he was playing Micheletto Corella, the merciless assassin and enforcer for Pope Jeremy Irons and his Borgia clan. Unpleasantly good at it he was too.

Perhaps it would be unfair to describe his appearance in Southcliffe as typecasting, but you can hardly fail to spot some similarities. As Stephen Morton, whose robotic killing spree with his private collection of automatic weapons is the driver behind a group of interlocking stories set in the coastal town of Southcliffe, Harris projects a similar suppressed intensity and inner turmoil, as well as a staring-eyed aura of unnerving menace. Like Corella, he uses silence as a deadly weapon.  

It's a formidable performance, and it can't have been an easy one to give. Writer Tony Grisoni has piled on the misery by making ex-soldier Morton a freakish loner in the grip of militaristic fantasies, living in a small house where he cares for his bedridden, invalid mother. There's a suspicion that you may be supposed to feel the occasional twinge of sympathy for him, before he cracks up entirely and shoots mum, dog and a long list of other locals.

But really, isn't this just ITV's Broadchurch with a mass murderer instead of a child killer? Again we have a small, tightly-knit community in a seaside town (Southcliffe was filmed in Faversham, Kent), and a story which is as much about the effect of the murder(s) on a cross-section of local people as it is about the crime itself. Both series share an irritating fragmented structure, so you're often momentarily bamboozled as you try to find your place on the timeline.

The phenomenon we may term Southchurch, or perhaps Broadcliffe, also seems in thrall to the delusion that a gloomy backstory and lives blighted by secret sadnesses automatically mean human interest and great drama. It's more like screenwriting-by-numbers, and is merely bloody depressing rather than offering any revelations into the human psyche. So, Southcliffe gives plenty of space to the philandering pub landlord Paul (Anatol Yusef), who short-changes Morton for odd jobs around the house and is openly cheating on his wife with a student. He's an odious little slimeball, and no more sympathetic after having his wife and kids murdered offscreen.

Then there's the sombre tale of Claire and Andrew Salter (pictured above, with daughter Anna at right). Claire (Shirley Henderson) works for Social Services and helps look after Morton's mother, but is being driven into terminal depression by her failure to conceive a child. Husband Andrew (Eddie Marsan) works at the local power station, and seems very nice and stultifyingly boring.

We're going to see a lot more of Rory Kinnear, playing flashy metropolitan TV journalist David Whitehead (pictured left). He too appears to be playing away from the missus, but the Morton killings present him with a special problem because he grew up (unhappily, of course) in Southcliffe. We kept getting great flashing warnings about how meaningful this was. First of all Whitehead tried to defy his news editor and not get assigned to the story. Then, as he drove down to the coast, his assistant in the passenger seat got a phone call saying the killer was Stephen Morton.

"Stephen Morton?" said Whitehead, as metaphorical violins played a shivering minor chord.

"Mean anything to you?" his companion retorted.

(Very long pause, tragic expression): "Yes... I remember the name."

Frankly this is dreary stuff, and - I may have said this before - there's surely a pressing need for a moratorium on murderers and serial killers. There are alternatives -  there have been successful series in the past about things like lawyers, politicians, the Home Guard, psychotherapists, cowboys, the advertising business, paranormal investigators, undertakers, the garment industry... You have to wonder if our TV is suffering from a mystery virus which blights the imagination, a dry rot of the soul. 

This is dreary stuff, and there's surely a pressing need for a moratorium on murderers and serial killers

rating

Editor Rating: 
2
Average: 2 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

Totally agree! It is bizarre the current deluge of murder-related drama swamping our screens and even more bizarre the level of acclaim these dramas invariably accrue. From 'The Fall', 'Broadchurch' to 'Southcliffe' and from the States the frankly risible 'Hannibal' and those endless police procedurals. Murder is thankfully an incredible rare event and one that the vast majority of us will never endure even tangentally and so are these dramas just a form of unsavoury voyeurism, a holiday in other people's misery, or intended as cathartic? Who knows but in my opinion they are invariably pretentious and full of self-regard --- and ultimately poor, unimaginative drama.

The 2nd episode was better & should of been shown first. Its not really a complicated plot, they have just tried hard to make it that way. Would of prefered to see the people living everday life before we see the massacre. Loved sean harris as morton though. Another highlight was the landlord & his mates, getting plastered & singing champagne supernova, would of liked to have seen more of them, hopefulluy were see more of his mates next weekend.

I have to agree this was dismal stuff both intended and unintended. Nic Roeg specialised in de-structuring time in his movies but the attempts at fragmentation here just led to confusion especially as several of the male characters looked alike. The best feature was the landscape all mist and marsh flats and I expected Peter Grimes to come lurching along the shore unfortunately it was just Stephen Morton a rather more prosaic character. Worse still there is a guy who has trudged about my neighbourhood for the last 20 years in combat gear and is the spitting image of Stephen but thankfully has not taken to taking pot shots at the locals - yet!

I watched episode 1 with a growing sense of tedium and irritation. The plotting was ludicrous, the characters about as interesting and realistic as Barbie dolls; the direction was lack-lustre and the editing truly abysmal. What was the point of a 30 seconds or more shot of some wallpaper? Apart from padding? The whole point of episode 1 of a 4 parter is to make people want to see episodes 2 to 4; here I was immensely grateful when the thing ended - the ads were actually better than the show. Abysmal is too kind a word. Guess who didn't watch part 2 and would rather eat a ground glass sandwich than see episodes 3 & 4?

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters