sun 22/12/2024

The Sleeping Beauty, Royal Ballet | reviews, news & interviews

The Sleeping Beauty, Royal Ballet

The Sleeping Beauty, Royal Ballet

Lauren Cuthbertson is an Aurora to remember in this sumptuous heritage production

Regal and dazzling: Lauren Cuthbertson shows us how the Rose Adagio should be done© Johan Persson

Clement Crisp, veteran ballet critic, once expressed his appreciation for Ashton’s Scènes de Ballet by saying that “if one had to throw ballets off the back of a sleigh, this would be the last to go.” Charming though the train of thought was that this metaphorical situation provoked (an insomniac ballet critic could muse on it for several nights), it can’t accommodate The Sleeping Beauty, which is to other ballets like the QE2 to Crisp’s sleigh.

This behemoth is not going to be thrown anywhere.

It’s not that I don’t like Sleeping Beauty; au contraire, I love it (thanks in no small part to that superb Tchaikovsky score, which weaves narrative and danceability together into a cloth-of-gold of seamless lustre). But you have to understand its nature: it’s not any old princess story (parents take note, Disney misled you: The Sleeping Beauty is not a great first ballet for children). Since the first production in the paranoid atmosphere of late-Imperial Russia, this has been a ballet about wealth and power; the intertwining of status and the status quo. Although imaginative reworkings exist – see Ashley Page’s sassy version for Scottish Ballet, where Aurora pricks her finger on a giant phallic cactus – they will always be dominated by those Beauties closer to the centres of power, like the bling-tastic Bolshoi version toured to London last August, or the sumptuous Royal Ballet heritage production revived yesterday at Covent Garden.

The front cloth for The Sleeping BeautyEverything about this production, a careful 2006 recreation of the seminal 1946 one which reopened the Opera House after the war, is meant to convince us that it is the definitive, the archetypal Beauty, down to (or perhaps especially) the programme notes which stridently proclaim its wonderful “Britishness” and national import. Whether its revival now, in Austerity Britain with the Scottish referendum looming, betokens anything other than the Royal Ballet’s increasingly box-office safe programming, is a question politically-minded audience members might like to ponder.

Leaving politics aside, there is plenty of wonderful artistry here, which can be enjoyed as pure escapism if you so choose. Oliver Messel’s designs are confections of architectural improbability washed over with the watercolour palette of tinted photographs (pictured above right). Few tutus in ballet combine colour, shape and decoration as well as the various fairy outfits here do; and the more theatrical costumes are decked in tastefully eye-catching glitter (any eighteenth century duchess – or Disney princess, come to that – would call her couturière immediately in a green tinge of envy on first sight of the Queen’s dress in the Prologue).

The choreography is a superb classical feast, and mostly well-executed by the company, though I hope it will be better in the rest of the run after yesterday’s first-night wobbles disappear. There were some interestingly jazzy, spiky takes on the fairy variations from Olivia Cowley and Claudia Dean (I wasn’t quite convinced), and James Hay made the fluttering Bluebird very fey with his sinuous épaulement; an impressive feat when executing grands batteries at the same time. Matthew Golding, the former Dutch National Ballet star making his first appearance with the Royal Ballet as a full-time Principal, gave a competent but uninspiring performance as the Prince; a nice enough dancer, I’ve yet to see him really light up a stage with character, though perhaps given time to settle at the Royal that will change.

Lauren Cuthbertson as Princess Aurora in The Sleeping BeautyFor megastar wattage last night we relied on his co-star, Lauren Cuthbertson as Princess Aurora (pictured left). The part requires a dancer to wait in her dressing room for an hour after the performance has started, then run on stage straight into the gimlet gaze of two thousand people watching for a wobble in the Rose Adagio, an apotheosis of classical choreography as well-known to even the amateur ballet-goer as Odile’s thirty-two fouettés in Swan Lake Act III, and considerably more difficult. Former Royal Ballet principal Deborah Bull has called it the “most terrifying dance in the ballet repertoire” and claimed she was “a bag of nerves” at the sound of its opening arpeggios. Well, judging from the way Lauren Cuthbertson exploded into Act II last night, she has nerves of steel, as well as utterly commanding stage presence. Her entrance, skittering in at the back with the broadest smile, was a spike of electricity to jolt the sleepy house into vibrating alertness.

Radiating confidence and artistry, Cuthbertson (aided by Sergey Levitin, whose rich tonality painted the violin solos with depth and colour) gave us a masterclass in the magnificence of Petipa’s choreography and Tchaikovsky’s music. Her poised arabesques and collected pirouettes showed us Aurora as dignified, the demure princess, but then Cuthbertson reminded us with her attack on those huge side developpés, and the near cadenza-like flair of her petit allegro variation, that this is a Crown Princess with the full majesty of divine-right rule and dynastic wealth behind her. The package was regal, and dazzling – much like the production whose crowning glory it was.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters