One of Us, BBC One | reviews, news & interviews
One of Us, BBC One
One of Us, BBC One
The deaths continue - but new series from 'The Missing' writers frustrates
“One of us is crying/ One of us is lying/ In her lonely bed/ Staring at the ceiling/ Wishing she was somewhere else instead…” Poor Juliet Stevenson must have wondered how she’d ended up like the girl in the Abba song – waiting for a call from her agent to apologise for getting her into this mess. It’s not Juliet’s fault. It’s the silly script.
One of Us began last week on a dark and stormy night when a paranoid schizophrenic off his meds (but on recreational drugs) butchered a pair of newly-weds before car-jacking a Lexus and driving to a lonely Scottish glen where both sets of in-laws lived. Unfortunately he crashed before he could wipe them all out so, having rescued him from the wreckage and only then discovering what he’d done, the bereaved locked him in a dog cage. Yet this didn’t stop someone slitting his throat.
It would be funny if we weren’t meant to take this nonsense seriously
This tale of two tribes, the House of Elliot and the House of Douglas, never comes to its senses. Stupidity is piled upon stupidity: having decided to lie to the police – headed by a drug-dealing detective (Laura Fraser) with a dying daughter – the naughty neighbours reject burning the body in case the smoke is spotted by the besieging paparazzi. Instead they bury the body and the stolen car with the aid of a bulldozer – in broad daylight (pictured below). Do they not have news-choppers north of the border?
Again, Jamie (Christian Ortega), the weird Douglas son who once took a gun to school to scare someone, is supposed not to hear the Elliot daughter driving home in the dark from work (where she tends a dying woman) because he’s listening to music through earphones. How can he not notice her blazing headlights? This might seem pernickety but it is symptomatic of a drama in which more care is devoted to close-ups of barbed wire than to the words.
The fourth death is a long time in coming, and belongs to someone only introduced a minute before. There’s zero opportunity for the viewer to empathise. A schoolgirl takes one of the detective’s tabs of LSD and drops out – of a high-rise window. It would be funny if we weren’t meant to take this nonsense seriously.
So what else actually happened in this second episode? Adrian Edmondson (the father absent from the Elliot household) confesses to his new wife that he has a family in Scotland – and that one of his sons has been slain. Juliet Stevenson, his ex-partner, finds a bloody, rusty knife. It’s not enough.
Writers Jack and Harry Williams are in danger of proving to be one-trick ponies. Whereas The Missing brilliantly drip-fed information against a French backdrop of increasing tension, watching One of Us is like trying to do a jigsaw depicting Scotch mist. As the happy couple discovered in the opening moments: life’s too short.
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
Lost that suspense we were
Lost that suspense we were left with at the end of the first episode, there would have been a Police presence at the farm as there lives were in danger, if I had a Lexus I would have a 'tracker' fitted, and the kid hacking into the girls messages, what's that all about. Not to mention the drug dealer having the police woman's phone number, what's that all about?
From the outset, I could tell
From the outset, I could tell this was going to be a hard and very unconvincing slog. The second episode confirmed my fears, with terrible over-acting from all concerned, especially Juliet Stevenson, who deserves better than this derivative and confusing rubbish. As for Ade Edmondson trying very hard to act upset, let's not go there.
If this was a graduation
If this was a graduation piece by a group of media students, it would be considered competent but no more: Derivative scenics; mood music which is now over-famliar from Norse/French imports; awkward characterisation and plot exposition. It brings nothing new to the table (so far). I'd like to be enjoying it more.
One or two of these Scottish
One or two of these Scottish accents are seriously questionable.
I thought this had the
I thought this had the makings of quite a clever twist on the usual mystery thriller - we knew who the first killer was pretty much straight away but then when he got killed overnight whilst locked up in the barn we were then speculating which member of the assembled double family group might have wielded the knife BUT the script and dialogue are awful in parts and the direction of what should have been a decent cast pretty is poor. Why did nobody change out of their soaking wet clothes in the first episode? I got half way through the second on catch up last night but it was all so wooden I just gave it up. Shame because it shoulkd hae been so much better.
Why did the nurse not suggest
Why did the nurse not suggest placing the driver if the Lexus in the recovery position?
Awful drama. Makes no sense
Awful drama. Makes no sense all the way.
What a shame as the actors are great.
how myopic are these writers
I had a go at this. (I think
Engaging enough to have me