Anne Boleyn, Channel 5 review - whispery and weepy | reviews, news & interviews
Anne Boleyn, Channel 5 review - whispery and weepy
Anne Boleyn, Channel 5 review - whispery and weepy
An imposing star presence undone by a prosaic script
"Get out!" The order, spoken some way into the third and final episode of Channel 5's entry into the Tudor drama sweepstakes, Anne Boleyn, certainly seizes one's attention.
The casting of a Black woman to play this role has guaranteed series creator and debut TV writer Eve Hedderwick Turner's project a certain amount of controversy from the start. The decision, we're firmly informed in the press notes, is intended to be "identity-conscious" (their word, not mine), as opposed to colour-blind, as is so often the norm elsewhere. Much ado about nothing, methinks: the program itself has the effect of making one ponder less the issue of race than how it is that such fine talents as Turner-Smith and Paapa Essiedu, the onetime Hamlet cast as Anne's closer-than-this brother George, made their way through the underwritten muddle on view. The prevailing psychobabble – Anne wants to speak to Jane Seymour (Lola Petticrew) "woman to woman" and talks about fear "[being] fuel if you know how to use it" – is presumably meant to connect the 16th century to the modern day. If so, we'd all be better off rocking out to the same character's hip-hop number ("Don't Lose Ur Head") in the ongoing stage musical hit, Six.
Indeed, this story has been told so many times across so many art forms (opera, books, Wolf Hall on TV and stage, Geneviève Bujold's Oscar-nominated screen performance in Anne of the Thousand Days) that this Anne Boleyn can be seen rather cynically to have relied on some unusual casting to generate interest that might otherwise have been absent. Taken on production terms alone, the result is handsomely photographed (by Nick Cooke) and communicates a dusky, candlelit environment conducive to the landscape of treachery and lies that unfolds.
But for the most part, we've been down this road so many times that Miller and her actors struggle to bring much that's fresh to the table. Structured as a countdown leading to her beheading, the three episodes want on the one hand to posit Anne as a proto-feminist ahead of her time whilst simultaneously marking her out as a tearful victim of male malfeasance, whether at the hands of Barry Ward's crypto-smiling Cromwell or a Henry VIII from Mark Stanley who gives off the air of having perhaps married his many wives during momentary furloughs from the rugby pitch (Turner-Smith and Stanley pictured above).
An elegant presence with an assured mien, Turner-Smith cuts an arresting figure from the start, which makes it that much more puzzling that she has presumably been instructed to speak sotto voce almost throughout. "Another loss may break her," we are told of a newly pregnant Anne's various miscarriages, and her downward journey lands her in an abyss with only her unshakeable spirit for company. Seen admiring the King James Bible in much the same way as did Miranda Raison in Howard Brenton's 2010 play about Anne Boleyn, Turner-Smith's Anne is subject to nightmares that are the stuff of celluloid cliché on the way toward that inner injunction to let her fear flag fly: now there's a pop anthem waiting to happen.
The supporting players include the West End's original Hamilton himself, Jamael Westman, and that ever-reliable theatre actress Isabella Laughland, neither of whom is given much to do, and Thalissa Teixera as a royal mistress, Madge Shelton, who finds compassion for the same heroine whom the men in Anne's orbit dismiss as "only a woman [whose] fit will pass". The program, too, leaves itself open for a sequel in a potted history lesson over the final credits informing us that Anne gave birth to "one of the greatest monarchs in history" in Elizabeth I. That may well be, but I was more immediately intrigued by the reminder that Henry married Jane Seymour a mere 11 days following Anne's execution. You've got to hand it to those Tudors: they didn't waste time.
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment