F**cking Men, Waterloo East Theatre - sex and not much else | reviews, news & interviews
F**cking Men, Waterloo East Theatre - sex and not much else
F**cking Men, Waterloo East Theatre - sex and not much else
Modern touch-up of Joe DiPietro's seminal gay play is rollicking but lacking
“This audience is very diverse, isn’t it?” joked one of the audience members at Fucking Men at Waterloo East Theatre, a reworking of Tony-winning writer Joe DiPietro’s seminal 2008 play (itself a reworking of Arthur Schnitzler’s La Ronde, written in 1897).
True in one sense and not in another: the crowd was mostly gay men of a certain age. But then, Fucking Men does what it says on the tin – it’s about gay men falling in and out of bed, and a few other places besides.
The format (carried over from La Ronde) is pleasingly circular: 10 scenes, post- or pre-coital, with one character from the previous scene leading us into the next. Steven Kunis’s production has a bouncing energy, buoyed by pulsing club music and dynamic lighting. Alex Lewer’s lighting design, Charlie Smith’s sound, and Cara Evans’ set and costumes create a dreamworld, a liminal space where the characters can pursue their desires. A circular bed dominates the stage, which echoes the dramatic structure, but also feels a bit too 80s for a play with smartphones in it.
They’re a diverse bunch, these men who have sex with men. The ten roles are played by four actors: Alex Britt, Charlie Condou, Derek Mitchell, and Stanton Plummer-Cambridge. There’s a married couple who’ve lost the spark after 11 years together (“12 in January”). There’s a Marine who insists he’s not gay and beats up a male escort after paying for a blowjob. There’s a tutor seduced by his student, and a writer who’s tricked into sex with a Hollywood star who promises to give him a lucrative job. In the last scene, we come back around to the beginning, with the chance for a happy ending this time.
The scenes are snappy, which leads to an unfortunate reliance on exposition to keep things moving. But the four actors dance well together, and each has their standout moment. Britt lets us see peeks of vulnerability under his characters’ swaggering snark. Mitchell’s movements as the painfully earnest writer are a delight to watch, by turns jerky and sinuous, getting the biggest laughs of the night. Plummer-Cambridge (pictured above right, with Condou) switches deftly between the closeted Marine, Steve, and smooth-talking husband Jack. Condou as his other half, Leo, is more subdued; there’s a lot bubbling under the surface of his awkward smiles.
A tight focus on the gay male experience naturally means excluding women, but DiPietro missteps here. The female figures of Fucking Men are mothers or carers, or girlfriends unaware that their partners are having sex with men. In presenting the breadth of gay men’s experience, DiPietro doesn’t let his women be more than cardboard cut-outs, which is a shame. There are jokes about bisexuality as a stopgap identity for men who don’t want to say they’re gay; the writer character (always a slippery slope) wonders if he has to call himself “queer” now. Though we get the sense DiPietro is poking fun at his own beliefs, the jokes still get laughs.
Fucking Men has been around, and then some, since it first premiered in 2008 at the Finborough. It works well in Waterloo East’s intimate space, but feels ready to burst onto a larger stage. That, however, might ruin the sense of the play as a window onto a world usually hidden from the prying eyes of people who aren’t gay men. Even 15 years since it was written, that glimpse is still groundbreaking.
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment