Witches review - beyond the broomstick, the cat, and the pointy hat | reviews, news & interviews
Witches review - beyond the broomstick, the cat, and the pointy hat
Witches review - beyond the broomstick, the cat, and the pointy hat
A documentary probes the links between stigmatised women and postpartum depression
From James I’s campaign to wipe out witchery to the feuding sister sorceresses of The Wizard of Oz and the new film musical Wicked, spellcasting by supposedly wayward women has never been able to avoid persecution and misunderstanding.
British filmmaker Elizabeth Sankey, who admits a childhood fascination with TV's “good witches”, like Bewitched's Samantha Stephens (Elizabeth Montgomery), recently found a deeper, more disturbing kinship with such figures. After the birth of her son, now three years old, Sankey suffered depression so severe that she spent months in a mother-baby psychiatric unit. As she recovered, she learned that perinatal mental illness, sudden and intense, is far from uncommon. Out of her worst fears (of self-harm, of being an unfit mother), Sankey pondered her illness’s connection to the plight of sociallly demonised women through the ages and in media.
Sankey’s new documentary at first seems like a scholarly, smartly edited meditation on witches in history. But as Witches includes the voices of women whom Sankey relied on to help her recover, it becomes a testament to the power of female friendship. That this ad hoc support group jokingly calls itself “our coven” is testimony to how far we’ve come from the days of the Salem witch trials. Or have we?
Sankey’s film weaves a dark tapestry of cinematic depictions of imaginary sorceresses and madwomen, drawing from classic cinema (Haxan, The Passion of Joan of Arc) to lighthearted fare like I Married a Witch to more recent shockers like Rosemary’s Baby, the original Suspiria, and of course, The Witch, which starred Anya Taylor-Joy as a Pilgrim-era girl tempted by the devil himself. (The documentary’s evocative soundscape, composed by Jeremy Warmsley, borrows too heavily from that film’s signature musical sting.)
Some of Sankey’s assertions are a stretch. The Jacobean-era witch hunts did not exclusively target women – men in Salem and the British Isles were executed, too. The religiosity and misogyny of those times made women’s work like midwifery and folk-healing suspect, but some of the talking heads in Witches disagree on the cause of persecution of outsider women.
“Witches embody all the worst fears about other people – that others could have evil intentions toward us or that imagined groups of people are plotting against us," says Marion Gibson, a professor at the University of Exeter. Sankey’s most moving arguments come from her own performance in the film’s black and white vignettes, where she casts herself as a bonneted Pilgrim and a beguiling, Veronica Lake-like fantasy figure (pictured above) cooking up a magical meal.
The film’s most shocking moment comes when Sankey reveals that though the U.K. has made progress in psychiatric care, setting up 22 inpatient mother-baby treatment centres, the suicide rate of new mothers has remained steady. With both humour and sorrow, Sankey recalls that the first medical professional who responded to her crisis told her, “Welcome to the Baby Blues” – as though sleeplessness, thoughts of suicide, and fears of harming her child might be dismissed with a joke. Witches should go a long way to taking postpartum depression – and socially stigamitised women – more seriously.
- More film reviews on theartsdesk
rating
Explore topics
Share this article
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
This article claims that the
This article claims that the snippet from "The Passion of Joan of Arc" is one of the "depictions of imaginary sorceresses and madwomen" although she was none of those things: certainly not imaginary, not a sorceress (even the tribunal finally dropped the witchcraft charges before the final set of 12 accusations were finalized near the end of the trial, and eyewitness accounts say that she opposed witchcraft), and she wasn't insane either: the idea she was afflicted by mental illness has been debunked by many doctors and historians such as Dr. Jean Nores, Dr. Antoine Yakovleff, Dr. John Hughes, Dr. Philip Mackowiak etc.