Prince Igor, Novaya Opera, London Coliseum | reviews, news & interviews
Prince Igor, Novaya Opera, London Coliseum
Prince Igor, Novaya Opera, London Coliseum
Carry On Up the Dnieper barely redeemed by decent musical values
Had this Moscow production any serious ideas in its head until its suddenly effective epilogue, much might have been pertinently said about an opera in which an imperialistic campaign ends in disaster, and where the Polovtsian “enemy” shows far more signs of a civilized life and wartime courtesy than the corrupt, crumbling court at home.
I don’t remember the Kolobov Novaya Opera Theatre of Moscow, to give its current full name, ever being as crass as this when I saw it in its ostentatious new theatre three years after its founding in 1997. Then there were high hopes for a production style which, if not as wifully radical as that of the very hit-and-miss Helikon company, could forge a strong alternative to Bolshoy tradition. Now it’s the Bolshoy which is welcoming in new directorial talent, albeit from abroad, while over at the Novaya Opera the spare, well-designed sets I remember from the 2000 Boris Godunov have been replaced by vulgar, tinselly awfulness in the one “exotic” act we get here, lacking even the charm of the painted flats in the old style. Stage and costume designer Vyacheslav Okunev has clearly been given too much new money to fling around.
The scenes in 12th century Putivl, Igor’s base in this anachronistic piece of nationalism with a twist, go well enough to begin with. Alexandrov postpones Glazunov’s marvellous work on the second-best Russian operatic overture after Glinka’s Ruslan and Lyudmila until after the Prologue (and then only gives us half of it). That makes us think we’re in for a journey along the Dnieper to the Polovtsian camp where Igor is quickly made a hospitably treated captive (Sergey Artamonov pictured below) – acts have previously been reversed in the Mariinsky version – but we stay in Putivl and, overture apart, have to wait for the big tunes until after the interval.
Warning signs soon creep in. The chorus are still up to the bad old sashaying, overacting tricks that bedevilled their Kirov counterparts 20 years ago; they sing well, but lack stage discipline. More worrying are the hunchback sisters busying themselves around Igor’s deserted wife Yaroslavna – first of much nonsensical (sorry, in this case nunsensical) movement business bedevilling every character who should be left alone. Much could have been made of corrupt Prince Galitsky (“Prince of Galich” here) and his drunken henchman lording it over defenceless women. But while an updated, Russian plutocrat debauchery might have been a latter-day cliché, here the stereotypes belong to the old school, everyone on stage having way too much of a good time to make any serious point about the roles of the sexes in a decadent patriarchal society.
Still, we’ve had stalwart singing from Sergey Artamonov’s legs-akimbo Igor and Evgeny Stavinsky’s not unattractive Galitsky – the only singer who shows any acting ability, albeit way over the top – and serviceable if typically squally-Russian-soprano work from Elena Popovskaya’s Yaroslavna (a sign of the company’s musical strengths is the double or triple casting; you may get better or worse if you go).
It all starts to fall risibly apart in Borodin’s gem, the uninterrupted sequence of pure inspiration in the Polovtsian camp – or is it the Polovtsian sex club in downtown Moscow? Why dress the Khan’s daughter Konchakovna (Agunda Kulaeva, another useful singer, stereotypical Russian mezzo this time) in the Russian equivalent of Ann Summers lingerie for large ladies? There’s no reason for her not to be an alluring but chaste eastern woman. When her would be lover Vladimir, Igor’s son, comes on, he seems to be addressing his love to two girly catamites, though it soon becomes clear that Kulaeva's butch, straddling dominatrix is the object of his desires. Tenor Aleksey Tatarintsev provides the most stylish singing of the evening, but is sabotaged by the ludicrous stage wrestling with his big beloved.
But you ain’t seen nothing yet: the ensuing farrago would have been jettisoned even from ENO's ill-fated staging of the kitschy Borodin musical Kismet. I gaped in disbelief at the so-called “choreography” for the rightly celebrated Polovtsian Dances: writhing, bare-bellied ladies wheeled on in baths or rolled out from carpets, hand-waggling Al Jolson style instead of any leaps from the men as the music demands – Fokine would jeté from his grave in horror – and a general melée of unpretty figures in what I guess is supposed to be Igor’s nightmare. It was certainly mine, and the urge to boo – which I never have done and never will – had to be suppressed.
Having cut the seven musical numbers Rimsky-Korsakov pieced together for Act Three, Alexandrov didn’t detain us long with the last act either. Yaroslavna’s lament was pierced last night by loud male hubbub behind the drop curtain. Then we got the duet with returning hubby, hair highlights for ageing added courtesy of the Polovtsian salon, and then no celebration, only the plangent a cappella lament about Russia’s devastation by the barbarian hordes: beautifully sung by a chorus at last completely still (pictured above).
Did Alexandrov have something to say after all? “We have forgotten to repent and acknowledge our mistakes,” which is what he writes in the programme, might even be a veiled hint at his country’s disastrous present course. But it was too late for that; the ultimate impression remains one of a musical world which can still field the strongest singers and players, but drowns their sterling virtues in a sea of bling, stand-and-deliver hokum and muddled messages.
rating
Explore topics
Share this article
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
Russian theatre is one of the
Not quite sure what
Not quite sure what 'conspiracies' you're referring to, helikon, other than the sad decline in production values here. But it is hardly 'improper' to see 'conspiracies' in the current Russian arts scene, vying for state approval which will now only be given under certain circumstances. I cite Ismene Brown's bulletins on proven 'conspiracies' at the Bolshoi, the unwise forays into political territory of Valery Gergiev and the censorship of the Novosibirsk Tannhauser as just a few examples of the national direction.
But yes, given free rein, Russian theatre (presumably embracing ballet and opera) IS one of the best in the world. And Russian artists do deserve something better, but from the present regime, not me.